Providing a clear, critical analysis of the history of Aboriginal law, A Reconciliation without Recollection? exposes the limitations of the current constitutional framework of reconciliation by following the lines of descent underlying the relationship between Crown and Aboriginal sovereignty.
Providing a clear, critical analysis of the history of Aboriginal law, A Reconciliation without Recollection? exposes the limitations of the current constitutional framework of reconciliation by following the lines of descent underlying the relationship between Crown and Aboriginal sovereignty.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Joshua Nichols is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Law at McGill University.
Inhaltsangabe
Foreword John Borrows Foreword James Tully Preface Acknowledgments Introduction Part 1 Reconciliation without Recollection 1.1 Reconciliation in Canadian Jurisprudence 1.2 Reconciliation as Picture Thinking A) Historicism B) The Ship of State 1.3 History, Law, and Legitimacy 1.4 Problem of Reconciliation as Problem of Foundations 1.5 A Genealogy of the Indian Act
Part 2 A Genealogy of Reconciliation: Civilizing, Extinction, and Culturalism as the Discursive Foundations of the Indian Act 2.1 Liberty and Legitimate Despotism: The Liberal-Imperialism of J.S. Mill 2.2 The Science of Savage Character: The Uncivilized and Mill’s Philosophy of History A) Governing the Uncivilized: The Role of the Intermediate Body B) Peace, Order, and Good Government: Mill and the Indian Question 2.3 Reading the Right of History: Universal History and the Extinction Thesis 2.4 From Enfranchisement to Reconciliation: Culturalism and Indirect Rule Part 3 A Despotism for Dealing with Barbarians: A Survey of the Foundations of Indian Policy in Canada 3.1 Pre-Confederation to the Indian Act of 1876 A) Imperial Federalism B) Imperial Civilizing C) Assimilation and Indirect Rule D) Striation or Continuity? 3.2 The Indian Question and the Dominion 3.3 The Six Nations Status Case A) The Six Nations of the Grand River B) The League of Nations and the Mandate System C) The Documents 3.4 A Building Crisis of Legitimacy Part 4 A Law without Measure for a Land without Citizens: The Indian Act in Canadian Jurisprudence 4.1 The Authority of s.91(24) A) St Catherine’s Milling, s.91(24), and the Division of Powers B) Interjurisdictional Immunity and s.91(24) C) The Theory of Enclaves D) The Uncertain Measure of Indianness E) Section 88 and Provincial Law 4.2 The Definition of Indians and the Authority of Bands A) Legislative Origins B) The Judicial Definition of Indians C) The Judicial Definition of Bands D) Custom Band Councils and the Question of Jurisdiction 4.3 Tsilhqot'in Nation and the Meaning of s.91(24) Part 5 An Era of Reconciliation, An Era of Indirect Rule: From the White Paper to the Full Box of Rights 5.1 The Hidden Player: Policy from Calder to the Indian Act, 1985 A) Line One: Legislative Renovation B) Line Two: Land Claim Agreements C) Line Three: Constitutional Change D) The Penner Report E) The Problem of Implementing the New Relationship F) The Era of Indirect Rule and the Mechanism of Deferral 5.2 Reconciliation and Implementation A) Unsettling the Ship of State B) Recollection without Historicism C) Implementing Reconciliation-with-Recollection Select Bibliography Index
Foreword John Borrows Foreword James Tully Preface Acknowledgments Introduction Part 1 Reconciliation without Recollection 1.1 Reconciliation in Canadian Jurisprudence 1.2 Reconciliation as Picture Thinking A) Historicism B) The Ship of State 1.3 History, Law, and Legitimacy 1.4 Problem of Reconciliation as Problem of Foundations 1.5 A Genealogy of the Indian Act
Part 2 A Genealogy of Reconciliation: Civilizing, Extinction, and Culturalism as the Discursive Foundations of the Indian Act 2.1 Liberty and Legitimate Despotism: The Liberal-Imperialism of J.S. Mill 2.2 The Science of Savage Character: The Uncivilized and Mill’s Philosophy of History A) Governing the Uncivilized: The Role of the Intermediate Body B) Peace, Order, and Good Government: Mill and the Indian Question 2.3 Reading the Right of History: Universal History and the Extinction Thesis 2.4 From Enfranchisement to Reconciliation: Culturalism and Indirect Rule Part 3 A Despotism for Dealing with Barbarians: A Survey of the Foundations of Indian Policy in Canada 3.1 Pre-Confederation to the Indian Act of 1876 A) Imperial Federalism B) Imperial Civilizing C) Assimilation and Indirect Rule D) Striation or Continuity? 3.2 The Indian Question and the Dominion 3.3 The Six Nations Status Case A) The Six Nations of the Grand River B) The League of Nations and the Mandate System C) The Documents 3.4 A Building Crisis of Legitimacy Part 4 A Law without Measure for a Land without Citizens: The Indian Act in Canadian Jurisprudence 4.1 The Authority of s.91(24) A) St Catherine’s Milling, s.91(24), and the Division of Powers B) Interjurisdictional Immunity and s.91(24) C) The Theory of Enclaves D) The Uncertain Measure of Indianness E) Section 88 and Provincial Law 4.2 The Definition of Indians and the Authority of Bands A) Legislative Origins B) The Judicial Definition of Indians C) The Judicial Definition of Bands D) Custom Band Councils and the Question of Jurisdiction 4.3 Tsilhqot'in Nation and the Meaning of s.91(24) Part 5 An Era of Reconciliation, An Era of Indirect Rule: From the White Paper to the Full Box of Rights 5.1 The Hidden Player: Policy from Calder to the Indian Act, 1985 A) Line One: Legislative Renovation B) Line Two: Land Claim Agreements C) Line Three: Constitutional Change D) The Penner Report E) The Problem of Implementing the New Relationship F) The Era of Indirect Rule and the Mechanism of Deferral 5.2 Reconciliation and Implementation A) Unsettling the Ship of State B) Recollection without Historicism C) Implementing Reconciliation-with-Recollection Select Bibliography Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
