Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Cumulative Innovation in the EU and the US]( "Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Cumulative Innovation in the EU and the US")
Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Cumulative Innovation in the EU and the US179,99 €![A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines]( "A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines")
A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines64,99 €![Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Inequality]( "Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Inequality")
Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Inequality119,99 €![Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge]( "Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge")
Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge42,99 €![Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade]( "Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade")
Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade183,99 €![Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge]( "Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge")
Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge111,99 €![Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Property Protection]( "Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Property Protection")
Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Property Protection176,99 €
This book results from a conference held in Singapore in September 2009 which brought together distinguished lawyers and economists to examine the differences and similarities in the intersection between intellectual property and competition laws in Asia. The prime focus was how best to balance these laws to improve economic welfare. Countries in Asia have different levels of development and experience with intellectual property and competition laws. Japan has the longest experience and now vigorously enforces both competition and intellectual property laws. Most other countries in Asia have only recently introduced intellectual property laws (due to the TRIPS Agreement) and competition laws (sometimes due to the World Bank, IMF or free trade agreements). It would be nave to think that laws, even if similar on the surface, will have the same goals or be enforced similarly. Countries have differing degrees of acceptance of these laws, different economic circumstances and differing