Philosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality
Herausgeber: Farina, Mirko; Lavazza, Andrea
Philosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality
Herausgeber: Farina, Mirko; Lavazza, Andrea
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This volume offers a new framework for understanding expertise. It proposes a reconceptualization of the traditional notion of expertise and calls for the development of a new contextual and action-oriented notion of expertise, which is attentive to axiological values, intellectual virtues, and moral qualities.
This volume offers a new framework for understanding expertise. It proposes a reconceptualization of the traditional notion of expertise and calls for the development of a new contextual and action-oriented notion of expertise, which is attentive to axiological values, intellectual virtues, and moral qualities.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Routledge
- Seitenzahl: 330
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Juli 2025
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 480g
- ISBN-13: 9781032449166
- ISBN-10: 1032449160
- Artikelnr.: 74444799
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Verlag: Routledge
- Seitenzahl: 330
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Juli 2025
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 480g
- ISBN-13: 9781032449166
- ISBN-10: 1032449160
- Artikelnr.: 74444799
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
Mirko Farina is Professor and Head of the Human Machine Interaction Lab (HMI Lab) in the Institute for Digital Economy and Artificial Systems (IDEAS), a joint collaboration between Xiamen University (XMU) and Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU). Prior to that he was Associate Professor of Philosophy at Innopolis University. Andrea Lavazza is a moral philosopher and a neuroethicist. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy, and Adjunct Professor in Neuroethics at the University of Milan and at the University of Pavia, Italy. His main interests are at the intersection of ethics, epistemology, and cognitive science.
Introduction: Gripping with the myth of neutrality Mirko Farina and Andrea
Lavazza Part 1: Defining Expertise 1. Trustworthy experts and untrustworthy
experts: Insights from the cognitive psychology of expertise Andrew J.
Waters and Fernand Gobet 2. Covid-19 and denialism: A primer on cognitive
psychology for science communicators and policymakers Andrea Lavazza and
Mirko Farina 3. Do we still need experts? Nick Brancazio and Neil Levy 4.
Hypocritical experts Duncan Pritchard 5. The epistemic authority of
practice Dylan Mirek Popowicz Part 2: Expertise in Action 6. Reimagining
expertise and neutrality toward epistemic justice in research, clinical
translation, and policy: A perspective from neuroethics Anna Nuechterlein,
Quinn Boyle, and Judy Illes 7. Expertise in action: Insights from
Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, Neil
Shortland, and Julie Gore 8. What the pandemic showed us about reason and
values Ulrike Hahn and Stephan Lewandowsky 9. The priests of the biomedical
religion: Against a flawed understanding of experts Ralf J. Jox 10. Scarce
resource allocation during infectious disease outbreaks: A communitarian
perspective Xiaozheng Yang and Yali Cong Part 3: Expertise and its Values
in the New World 11. Legal expertise and its subject matter within common
law adjudication John Coggon 12. The revolution of (neuroscience) experts
in the courtroom? Ilaria Zampieri, Matteo Pirisi, and Pietro Pietrini 13.
When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of
Australian women's perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer
risk Kristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, and Paul R. Ward 14. The post-truth
challenge to expertise Douglas V. Porpora 15. Expertise for a New World: Is
bioarchaeology fit for purpose? Charlotte A. Roberts
Lavazza Part 1: Defining Expertise 1. Trustworthy experts and untrustworthy
experts: Insights from the cognitive psychology of expertise Andrew J.
Waters and Fernand Gobet 2. Covid-19 and denialism: A primer on cognitive
psychology for science communicators and policymakers Andrea Lavazza and
Mirko Farina 3. Do we still need experts? Nick Brancazio and Neil Levy 4.
Hypocritical experts Duncan Pritchard 5. The epistemic authority of
practice Dylan Mirek Popowicz Part 2: Expertise in Action 6. Reimagining
expertise and neutrality toward epistemic justice in research, clinical
translation, and policy: A perspective from neuroethics Anna Nuechterlein,
Quinn Boyle, and Judy Illes 7. Expertise in action: Insights from
Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, Neil
Shortland, and Julie Gore 8. What the pandemic showed us about reason and
values Ulrike Hahn and Stephan Lewandowsky 9. The priests of the biomedical
religion: Against a flawed understanding of experts Ralf J. Jox 10. Scarce
resource allocation during infectious disease outbreaks: A communitarian
perspective Xiaozheng Yang and Yali Cong Part 3: Expertise and its Values
in the New World 11. Legal expertise and its subject matter within common
law adjudication John Coggon 12. The revolution of (neuroscience) experts
in the courtroom? Ilaria Zampieri, Matteo Pirisi, and Pietro Pietrini 13.
When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of
Australian women's perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer
risk Kristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, and Paul R. Ward 14. The post-truth
challenge to expertise Douglas V. Porpora 15. Expertise for a New World: Is
bioarchaeology fit for purpose? Charlotte A. Roberts
Introduction: Gripping with the myth of neutrality Mirko Farina and Andrea
Lavazza Part 1: Defining Expertise 1. Trustworthy experts and untrustworthy
experts: Insights from the cognitive psychology of expertise Andrew J.
Waters and Fernand Gobet 2. Covid-19 and denialism: A primer on cognitive
psychology for science communicators and policymakers Andrea Lavazza and
Mirko Farina 3. Do we still need experts? Nick Brancazio and Neil Levy 4.
Hypocritical experts Duncan Pritchard 5. The epistemic authority of
practice Dylan Mirek Popowicz Part 2: Expertise in Action 6. Reimagining
expertise and neutrality toward epistemic justice in research, clinical
translation, and policy: A perspective from neuroethics Anna Nuechterlein,
Quinn Boyle, and Judy Illes 7. Expertise in action: Insights from
Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, Neil
Shortland, and Julie Gore 8. What the pandemic showed us about reason and
values Ulrike Hahn and Stephan Lewandowsky 9. The priests of the biomedical
religion: Against a flawed understanding of experts Ralf J. Jox 10. Scarce
resource allocation during infectious disease outbreaks: A communitarian
perspective Xiaozheng Yang and Yali Cong Part 3: Expertise and its Values
in the New World 11. Legal expertise and its subject matter within common
law adjudication John Coggon 12. The revolution of (neuroscience) experts
in the courtroom? Ilaria Zampieri, Matteo Pirisi, and Pietro Pietrini 13.
When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of
Australian women's perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer
risk Kristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, and Paul R. Ward 14. The post-truth
challenge to expertise Douglas V. Porpora 15. Expertise for a New World: Is
bioarchaeology fit for purpose? Charlotte A. Roberts
Lavazza Part 1: Defining Expertise 1. Trustworthy experts and untrustworthy
experts: Insights from the cognitive psychology of expertise Andrew J.
Waters and Fernand Gobet 2. Covid-19 and denialism: A primer on cognitive
psychology for science communicators and policymakers Andrea Lavazza and
Mirko Farina 3. Do we still need experts? Nick Brancazio and Neil Levy 4.
Hypocritical experts Duncan Pritchard 5. The epistemic authority of
practice Dylan Mirek Popowicz Part 2: Expertise in Action 6. Reimagining
expertise and neutrality toward epistemic justice in research, clinical
translation, and policy: A perspective from neuroethics Anna Nuechterlein,
Quinn Boyle, and Judy Illes 7. Expertise in action: Insights from
Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, Neil
Shortland, and Julie Gore 8. What the pandemic showed us about reason and
values Ulrike Hahn and Stephan Lewandowsky 9. The priests of the biomedical
religion: Against a flawed understanding of experts Ralf J. Jox 10. Scarce
resource allocation during infectious disease outbreaks: A communitarian
perspective Xiaozheng Yang and Yali Cong Part 3: Expertise and its Values
in the New World 11. Legal expertise and its subject matter within common
law adjudication John Coggon 12. The revolution of (neuroscience) experts
in the courtroom? Ilaria Zampieri, Matteo Pirisi, and Pietro Pietrini 13.
When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of
Australian women's perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer
risk Kristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, and Paul R. Ward 14. The post-truth
challenge to expertise Douglas V. Porpora 15. Expertise for a New World: Is
bioarchaeology fit for purpose? Charlotte A. Roberts
