Katalin Ligeti, J. A. E. Vervaele, Andrae Klip

Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Eu Criminal Law

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This edited volume is based on the European Law Institute's project, 'The Prevention and Resolution of Conflicts of Exercise of Jurisdiction in Criminal Law'. The ELI's project on conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal law was set up to explore options for a coherent regulatory mechanism for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction, which is essential for the effective functioning of a European criminal justice area built on mutual recognition. Currently, there are no binding instruments establishing a mechanism to resolve conflicts of (exercising) jurisdiction in criminal matters in the EU.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: OXFORD UNIV PR
• Seitenzahl: 362
• Erscheinungstermin: 19. Februar 2019
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 240mm x 161mm x 24mm
• Gewicht: 708g
• ISBN-13: 9780198829119
• ISBN-10: 0198829116
• Artikelnr.: 53608690

Autorenporträt

Part I - Instrument of the European Law Institute is edited by the European Law Institute Part II - Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law (articles edited by Katalin Ligeti and Gavin Robinson, University of Luxembourg)

Inhaltsangabe

* PART I: A European Law Institute Instrument
* Preface to Part I
* Draft Legislative Proposals for the prevention and resolution of
conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal matters in the European Union
* PART II: Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU
Criminal Law
* Preface to Part II
* Introduction to the Articles
* 1: Angelo Marletta: Report on the Field Research at Eurojust,
February 2015
* 2: Martin Wasmeier: The legal basis for preventing and resolving
conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the TFEU
* 3: Miguel Carmona Ruano: Prevention and settlement of conflicts of
jurisdiction (Spanish system)
* 4: Angelo Marletta: Forum choice in the area of freedom, security and
justice
* 5: Katalin Ligeti: Fundamental rights protection between Strasbourg
and Luxembourg: Extending transnational ne bis in idem across
administrative and criminal procedures
* 6: Gavin Robinson: Choice of forum and cybercrime
* 7: Pietro Ortolani: Conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal law:
Lessons from European civil procedure
* 8: Aukje van Hoek: Mutual recognition, choice of forum, and lis
pendens: A civil law threesome transposed
* 9: Michiel Luchtman: Choice of forum, European citizenship, and
fundamental rights: The position of the defendant
* 10: Michele Simonato: What role for crime victims in the forum
choice?
* 11: Hans- Holger Herrnfeld: Choice of forum and case allocation in
the EPPO Regulation