Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Selection Process of U.S. Army Recruiters]( "Selection Process of U.S. Army Recruiters")
Selection Process of U.S. Army Recruiters17,99 €![Development of a Formal Army Officer Mentorship Program for the Twenty-First Century]( "Development of a Formal Army Officer Mentorship Program for the Twenty-First Century")
Development of a Formal Army Officer Mentorship Program for the Twenty-First Century17,99 €![Higher Order Thinking in the Australian Army Suite of Logistic Officer Courses]( "Higher Order Thinking in the Australian Army Suite of Logistic Officer Courses")
Higher Order Thinking in the Australian Army Suite of Logistic Officer Courses17,99 €![Relationship Between Army Officer Personality Type, Combat Identifier, Leadership Style, and Career Satisfaction]( "Relationship Between Army Officer Personality Type, Combat Identifier, Leadership Style, and Career Satisfaction")
Relationship Between Army Officer Personality Type, Combat Identifier, Leadership Style, and Career Satisfaction17,99 €![An Evaluation of the Air Force's Enlisted Performance Report and Promotion System]( "An Evaluation of the Air Force's Enlisted Performance Report and Promotion System")
An Evaluation of the Air Force's Enlisted Performance Report and Promotion System14,99 €![Active Duty Officer Force Development]( "Active Duty Officer Force Development")
Active Duty Officer Force Development14,99 €![An Assessment of US Navy Junior Officer Retention, 1998-2000]( "An Assessment of US Navy Junior Officer Retention, 1998-2000")
An Assessment of US Navy Junior Officer Retention, 1998-200014,99 €
A narrative evaluation report primarily utilized for promotion selection is ineffective and inefficient in identifying both performance and potential ratings. Alternative evaluation report formats utilizing a more quantitative format with ratings applied against performance standards will greatly improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the evaluation report. The purpose of this research is to examine the format of the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) in relation to how it is utilized by promotion and command selection boards. Over fifty percent of the OER is written in narrative format, however, selection boards consistently report that board members will only read three to four sentences of this predominately narrative report. I will examine the format of the OER and how it is used by centalized promotion and command selection boards. With the basis of how selection boards utilize the OER I will examine alternative evaluation reporting methods for more effective and efficient reporting of an officer's performance and potential. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.