Convention teaches that the absence of liability - in particular contractual invalidity - is itself a reason for the restitution of transfers in the South African law of unjustified enrichment. Scott argues that while the absence of a relationship of indebtedness is a necessary condition for restitution, it is not a sufficient condition.
Convention teaches that the absence of liability - in particular contractual invalidity - is itself a reason for the restitution of transfers in the South African law of unjustified enrichment. Scott argues that while the absence of a relationship of indebtedness is a necessary condition for restitution, it is not a sufficient condition.
Helen Scott is an Associate Professor in the Department of Private Law at the University of Cape Town.
Inhaltsangabe
1 Introduction I Enrichment Liability in the Civilian Tradition II Enrichment Liability in South African Law III A Law of Unjustified Enrichment? IV Unjust Enrichment: the Reanalysis of Enrichment by Transfer V Beyond the Condictiones VI Plan of Action Part I Mistake 2 Mistake: Nineteenth Century I Introduction II Condictio Indebiti III Restitutio in Integrum on Grounds of Iustus Error IV Restitution of Contractual Performance on Grounds of Iustus Error V Conclusion 3. Mistake Continued: Twentieth Century and Beyond I Introduction II Twentieth Century: Excusable Mistake of Fact III Willis Faber Enthoven (Pty) Ltd v Receiver of Revenue IV Twenty-first Century: Excusable Mistake V Analysis: Excusable Mistake in South African Law Part II Compulsion and Incapacity Introduction: Taking Stock 4 Compulsion I Introduction II Historical Background III Restitution of Compelled Transfers: Nineteenth Century IV Restitution of Compelled Transfers: Twentieth Century V Analysis 5 Incapacity: Minority and the Doctrine of Ultra Vires I Introduction II Historical background III Restitution of Minors' Transfers in South African Law IV Restitution of Ultra Vires Transfers V Conclusion Part III Theory 6 Theory: Unjust Factors or Absence of Legal Ground? I Introduction II Unjust Factors Analysis in English Law III Absence of Legal Ground Analysis IV Civilian Critique of the Unjust Factors Analysis V The Case for Unjust Factors VI Unjust Factors and the Common Law Method VII A Mixed Approach 7 Conclusion I Unjust Enrichment in South African Law II In Defence of the Unjust Factors Analysis III Unjust Enrichment: the Future
1 Introduction I Enrichment Liability in the Civilian Tradition II Enrichment Liability in South African Law III A Law of Unjustified Enrichment? IV Unjust Enrichment: the Reanalysis of Enrichment by Transfer V Beyond the Condictiones VI Plan of Action Part I Mistake 2 Mistake: Nineteenth Century I Introduction II Condictio Indebiti III Restitutio in Integrum on Grounds of Iustus Error IV Restitution of Contractual Performance on Grounds of Iustus Error V Conclusion 3. Mistake Continued: Twentieth Century and Beyond I Introduction II Twentieth Century: Excusable Mistake of Fact III Willis Faber Enthoven (Pty) Ltd v Receiver of Revenue IV Twenty-first Century: Excusable Mistake V Analysis: Excusable Mistake in South African Law Part II Compulsion and Incapacity Introduction: Taking Stock 4 Compulsion I Introduction II Historical Background III Restitution of Compelled Transfers: Nineteenth Century IV Restitution of Compelled Transfers: Twentieth Century V Analysis 5 Incapacity: Minority and the Doctrine of Ultra Vires I Introduction II Historical background III Restitution of Minors' Transfers in South African Law IV Restitution of Ultra Vires Transfers V Conclusion Part III Theory 6 Theory: Unjust Factors or Absence of Legal Ground? I Introduction II Unjust Factors Analysis in English Law III Absence of Legal Ground Analysis IV Civilian Critique of the Unjust Factors Analysis V The Case for Unjust Factors VI Unjust Factors and the Common Law Method VII A Mixed Approach 7 Conclusion I Unjust Enrichment in South African Law II In Defence of the Unjust Factors Analysis III Unjust Enrichment: the Future
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
