Melis Ozdel
Bills of Lading Incorporating Charterparties
Melis Ozdel
Bills of Lading Incorporating Charterparties
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Entirely dedicated to the topic of the incorporation of charterparty terms into bills of lading, this book discusses and analyses the legal and practical issues surrounding this topic under English and US law.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Professor Charles DebattistaDebattista on Bills of Lading in Commodities Trade390,99 €
Bruno Rodríguez-RosadoCause and Consideration123,99 €
The Common Law of Obligations58,99 €
Nicholas McBride (UK University of Cambridge)Key Ideas in Contract Law20,99 €
David WintertonMoney Awards in Contract Law105,99 €
Commercial Bar Association (Combar) 1989-201456,99 €
Graham Stephenson (formerly of the University of Central LancashireCore Statutes on Contract, Tort & Restitution 2022-2322,99 €-
-
-
Entirely dedicated to the topic of the incorporation of charterparty terms into bills of lading, this book discusses and analyses the legal and practical issues surrounding this topic under English and US law.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Seitenzahl: 248
- Erscheinungstermin: 26. Januar 2017
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 14mm
- Gewicht: 414g
- ISBN-13: 9781509913770
- ISBN-10: 1509913777
- Artikelnr.: 53629703
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Seitenzahl: 248
- Erscheinungstermin: 26. Januar 2017
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 14mm
- Gewicht: 414g
- ISBN-13: 9781509913770
- ISBN-10: 1509913777
- Artikelnr.: 53629703
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
Melis Özdel is a Lecturer in Maritime and Commercial Law at University College London and Deputy Director of the UCL Centre for Commercial Law. Alongside her academic life, Melis is a practising advocate in Istanbul, Turkey.
1. The Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
I. Choosing the Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
II. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the English
Approach
A. The Use of Putativity
B. An Alternative Method to the Use of Putativity
III. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the US
Approach
IV. Conclusion: Should the Putative Proper Law Lead the Way?
2. Choosing the Charterparty to be Incorporated
I. Does the Charterparty Need to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. Is there a Condition to Identify the Charterparty?
C. How is the Charterparty to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
D. Inaccurate and/or Ambiguous References
II. Which Charterparty is Deemed to be Referred to in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. The Position under US Law
C. The Position under English Law
III. Is the Charterparty Capable of Being Incorporated?
A. Overview
B. What Forms of Charterparty can be Incorporated?
C. Do We Need an Already Concluded Charterparty by the Time the Bill of
Lading is Issued?
D. The Incorporation of Charterparty Terms that have
been Amended or Rectified
E. Charterparties Rescinded, Terminated or Invalidated
IV. Conclusion
3. Giving Effect to the Words of Incorporation
I. What Words of Incorporation are Apt to Incorporate?
A. How are the Charterparty Terms to be Described under a Bill of Lading?
B. Incorporating the Charterparty Forum Selection Clauses
II. Manipulation of the Incorporated Charterparty Provisions
A. English Law
B. US Law
C. Are the Rules of Manipulation Justifiable?
III. Conclusion
4. The Operative Words of Incorporation
I. Is the Charterparty or the Bill of Lading the Driving Force for
Incorporation?
II. Are These Rules Workable?
III. Conclusion
5. The Consistency Test
I. The Incorporated Charterparty Clauses Repugnant to the Bill of Lading
A. When is there Inconsistency between the Provisions and Which One
Prevails?
B. Where do These Rules Take Us?
II. Consistency of the Provisions with the Hague and the Hague-Visby Rules
A. Historical Background to the Conventions
B. Which Prevails?
C. Validity of Incorporated Forum Selection Clauses under the Rules
D. Validity of Carrier's Terms on Loading and Discharge of the Cargo
III. Final Remarks on the Consistency Test
I. Choosing the Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
II. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the English
Approach
A. The Use of Putativity
B. An Alternative Method to the Use of Putativity
III. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the US
Approach
IV. Conclusion: Should the Putative Proper Law Lead the Way?
2. Choosing the Charterparty to be Incorporated
I. Does the Charterparty Need to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. Is there a Condition to Identify the Charterparty?
C. How is the Charterparty to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
D. Inaccurate and/or Ambiguous References
II. Which Charterparty is Deemed to be Referred to in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. The Position under US Law
C. The Position under English Law
III. Is the Charterparty Capable of Being Incorporated?
A. Overview
B. What Forms of Charterparty can be Incorporated?
C. Do We Need an Already Concluded Charterparty by the Time the Bill of
Lading is Issued?
D. The Incorporation of Charterparty Terms that have
been Amended or Rectified
E. Charterparties Rescinded, Terminated or Invalidated
IV. Conclusion
3. Giving Effect to the Words of Incorporation
I. What Words of Incorporation are Apt to Incorporate?
A. How are the Charterparty Terms to be Described under a Bill of Lading?
B. Incorporating the Charterparty Forum Selection Clauses
II. Manipulation of the Incorporated Charterparty Provisions
A. English Law
B. US Law
C. Are the Rules of Manipulation Justifiable?
III. Conclusion
4. The Operative Words of Incorporation
I. Is the Charterparty or the Bill of Lading the Driving Force for
Incorporation?
II. Are These Rules Workable?
III. Conclusion
5. The Consistency Test
I. The Incorporated Charterparty Clauses Repugnant to the Bill of Lading
A. When is there Inconsistency between the Provisions and Which One
Prevails?
B. Where do These Rules Take Us?
II. Consistency of the Provisions with the Hague and the Hague-Visby Rules
A. Historical Background to the Conventions
B. Which Prevails?
C. Validity of Incorporated Forum Selection Clauses under the Rules
D. Validity of Carrier's Terms on Loading and Discharge of the Cargo
III. Final Remarks on the Consistency Test
1. The Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
I. Choosing the Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
II. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the English
Approach
A. The Use of Putativity
B. An Alternative Method to the Use of Putativity
III. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the US
Approach
IV. Conclusion: Should the Putative Proper Law Lead the Way?
2. Choosing the Charterparty to be Incorporated
I. Does the Charterparty Need to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. Is there a Condition to Identify the Charterparty?
C. How is the Charterparty to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
D. Inaccurate and/or Ambiguous References
II. Which Charterparty is Deemed to be Referred to in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. The Position under US Law
C. The Position under English Law
III. Is the Charterparty Capable of Being Incorporated?
A. Overview
B. What Forms of Charterparty can be Incorporated?
C. Do We Need an Already Concluded Charterparty by the Time the Bill of
Lading is Issued?
D. The Incorporation of Charterparty Terms that have
been Amended or Rectified
E. Charterparties Rescinded, Terminated or Invalidated
IV. Conclusion
3. Giving Effect to the Words of Incorporation
I. What Words of Incorporation are Apt to Incorporate?
A. How are the Charterparty Terms to be Described under a Bill of Lading?
B. Incorporating the Charterparty Forum Selection Clauses
II. Manipulation of the Incorporated Charterparty Provisions
A. English Law
B. US Law
C. Are the Rules of Manipulation Justifiable?
III. Conclusion
4. The Operative Words of Incorporation
I. Is the Charterparty or the Bill of Lading the Driving Force for
Incorporation?
II. Are These Rules Workable?
III. Conclusion
5. The Consistency Test
I. The Incorporated Charterparty Clauses Repugnant to the Bill of Lading
A. When is there Inconsistency between the Provisions and Which One
Prevails?
B. Where do These Rules Take Us?
II. Consistency of the Provisions with the Hague and the Hague-Visby Rules
A. Historical Background to the Conventions
B. Which Prevails?
C. Validity of Incorporated Forum Selection Clauses under the Rules
D. Validity of Carrier's Terms on Loading and Discharge of the Cargo
III. Final Remarks on the Consistency Test
I. Choosing the Law Governing the Incorporation Issue
II. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the English
Approach
A. The Use of Putativity
B. An Alternative Method to the Use of Putativity
III. Presumptive Solutions in Ascertaining the Applicable Law: the US
Approach
IV. Conclusion: Should the Putative Proper Law Lead the Way?
2. Choosing the Charterparty to be Incorporated
I. Does the Charterparty Need to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. Is there a Condition to Identify the Charterparty?
C. How is the Charterparty to be Identified in the Bill of Lading?
D. Inaccurate and/or Ambiguous References
II. Which Charterparty is Deemed to be Referred to in the Bill of Lading?
A. Overview
B. The Position under US Law
C. The Position under English Law
III. Is the Charterparty Capable of Being Incorporated?
A. Overview
B. What Forms of Charterparty can be Incorporated?
C. Do We Need an Already Concluded Charterparty by the Time the Bill of
Lading is Issued?
D. The Incorporation of Charterparty Terms that have
been Amended or Rectified
E. Charterparties Rescinded, Terminated or Invalidated
IV. Conclusion
3. Giving Effect to the Words of Incorporation
I. What Words of Incorporation are Apt to Incorporate?
A. How are the Charterparty Terms to be Described under a Bill of Lading?
B. Incorporating the Charterparty Forum Selection Clauses
II. Manipulation of the Incorporated Charterparty Provisions
A. English Law
B. US Law
C. Are the Rules of Manipulation Justifiable?
III. Conclusion
4. The Operative Words of Incorporation
I. Is the Charterparty or the Bill of Lading the Driving Force for
Incorporation?
II. Are These Rules Workable?
III. Conclusion
5. The Consistency Test
I. The Incorporated Charterparty Clauses Repugnant to the Bill of Lading
A. When is there Inconsistency between the Provisions and Which One
Prevails?
B. Where do These Rules Take Us?
II. Consistency of the Provisions with the Hague and the Hague-Visby Rules
A. Historical Background to the Conventions
B. Which Prevails?
C. Validity of Incorporated Forum Selection Clauses under the Rules
D. Validity of Carrier's Terms on Loading and Discharge of the Cargo
III. Final Remarks on the Consistency Test







