Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Seven Days' Battles In Front Of Richmond. An Outline Narrative Of The Series Of Engagements Which Opened At Mechanicsville, Near Richmond, On Thursday, June 26, 1862, And Resulted In The Defeat Of The Northern Army Under Major-general M'clellan]( "The Seven Days' Battles In Front Of Richmond. An Outline Narrative Of The Series Of Engagements Which Opened At Mechanicsville, Near Richmond, On Thursday, June 26, 1862, And Resulted In The Defeat Of The Northern Army Under Major-general M'clellan")
The Seven Days' Battles In Front Of Richmond. An Outline Narrative Of The Series Of Engagements Which Opened At Mechanicsville, Near Richmond, On Thursday, June 26, 1862, And Resulted In The Defeat Of The Northern Army Under Major-general M'clellan25,99 €![Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory]( "Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory")
Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory28,99 €![Critical Analysis on the Defeat of Task Force Ranger]( "Critical Analysis on the Defeat of Task Force Ranger")
Critical Analysis on the Defeat of Task Force Ranger25,99 €![Unknown Future and a Doubtful Present]( "Unknown Future and a Doubtful Present")
Unknown Future and a Doubtful Present29,99 €![Braddock S Defeat]( "Braddock S Defeat")
Braddock S Defeat29,99 €![Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 1]( "Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 1")
Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 128,99 €![Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 3]( "Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 3")
Handbook for Military Government in Germany Prior to Defeat or Surrender, Part 328,99 €
Throughout the past 15 years, both the Western allies and the Russians have entered into a series of military engagements that have in one way or another spectacularly failed to achieve the results intended, namely a decisive military victory which would in turn deliver a solution to the original political problem. The nature of US military operations in the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has achieved dramatic military victories but has failed to deliver the political aims of the conflicts. Many analysts attempt to explain the phenomenon by describing changes in the strategic environment that have rendered conventional interstate warfare ineffective or even irrelevant or obsolete. Many even claim that the age of conventional warfare is over, and that the world has transitioned to a new irregular paradigm of conflict. Other analysts point to organizational and cultural preferences for conventional warfare or for material-based or technological solutions that are inappropriate to the situation. However, these concepts are merely symptoms, or at best precipitating causes and not the proximate cause of this seeming lack of military effectiveness in securing national policy objectives. Instead, the principal cause of the lack of efficacy in the modern military art is a flawed conceptual approach and design to current joint and Army doctrine. Conceptually, the essential problem is that combat operations and stability operations are fundamentally different forms of operations, yet are tightly interconnected. To resolve this tension, a military doctrine must not only account for both combat and stability operations, but must also effectively integrate the two into a comprehensive and workable framework. Although current US joint doctrine and the Army's doctrine of Full Spectrum Operations both include stability operations, their flawed conceptual approaches intersect to produce an unworkable operational framework for the conduct of both stability operations and combat This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.