Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Manual of the Woodcraft Indians; the Fourteenth Birch-bark Roll, Containing Their Constitution, Laws, and Deeds, and Much Additional Matter]( "Manual of the Woodcraft Indians; the Fourteenth Birch-bark Roll, Containing Their Constitution, Laws, and Deeds, and Much Additional Matter")
Manual of the Woodcraft Indians; the Fourteenth Birch-bark Roll, Containing Their Constitution, Laws, and Deeds, and Much Additional Matter17,99 €![The Anzus Rift: The Politics of the Matter]( "The Anzus Rift: The Politics of the Matter")
The Anzus Rift: The Politics of the Matter52,99 €![Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet]( "Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet")
Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet22,99 €![Science for Beginners: An Introduction to the Method and Matter of Science]( "Science for Beginners: An Introduction to the Method and Matter of Science")
Science for Beginners: An Introduction to the Method and Matter of Science24,99 €![Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession]( "Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession")
Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession52,99 €![Developing a Reference Framework for Cybercraft Trust Evaluation]( "Developing a Reference Framework for Cybercraft Trust Evaluation")
Developing a Reference Framework for Cybercraft Trust Evaluation15,99 €![Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni]( "Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni")
Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni21,99 €
Doctrinal differences over the employment of airpower are as old as military aviation itself. One particular area of contention has been close air support (CAS).The two primary issues related to CAS are its command and control and responsiveness. Soldiers have argued that ground commanders should control their own aircraft, because ownership assures that airpower directly responds to their needs. Airmen have maintained that airpower should be centralized under a single air commander to allow for its flexible theater wide employment. During World War II, Korea, Vietnam, and Desert Storm, ground commanders demanded greater influence over airpower employment. Concurrently, the Air Force disagreed with the Navy and Marine Corps over centralized versus decentralized control of air assets. These two issues of command and control and responsiveness are embodied in the process of apportioning and allocating CAS. In all conflicts since World War II, the United States has had the luxury of an overabundance of air assets. Despite a facade of centralization, airpower was parceled out to fill nearly everyone's needs. This avoided the need for any difficult choices. This study follows the history of CAS since World War II to examine how it has been apportioned and allocated in the past. It then examines the current joint air operations process. It is the contention of this study that the current system, rooted in its historical past, does not fully employ CAS to its optimum potential. The historical view of CAS has been as a tactical measure, with limited localized effects. However, properly integrated and coequal with the ground scheme of maneuver, it can have operational level effects. This study examines two theories of the use of CAS at the operational level and then recommends changes to the view of CAS and the process for its apportionment and allocation. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.