Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Amélioration de l'aérodynamisme du Scorpio Classic à l'aide de simulations CFD]( "Amélioration de l'aérodynamisme du Scorpio Classic à l'aide de simulations CFD")
Amélioration de l'aérodynamisme du Scorpio Classic à l'aide de simulations CFD29,99 €![Aerodynamische Verbesserung des Scorpio Classic durch CFD-Simulationen]( "Aerodynamische Verbesserung des Scorpio Classic durch CFD-Simulationen")
Aerodynamische Verbesserung des Scorpio Classic durch CFD-Simulationen43,90 €![Ulepszenie aerodynamiki Scorpio Classic za pomoc¿ symulacji CFD]( "Ulepszenie aerodynamiki Scorpio Classic za pomoc¿ symulacji CFD")
Ulepszenie aerodynamiki Scorpio Classic za pomoc¿ symulacji CFD29,99 €![Miglioramento aerodinamico dello Scorpio Classic mediante simulazioni CFD]( "Miglioramento aerodinamico dello Scorpio Classic mediante simulazioni CFD")
Miglioramento aerodinamico dello Scorpio Classic mediante simulazioni CFD29,99 €![Melhoria aerodinâmica do Scorpio Classic utilizando simulações CFD]( "Melhoria aerodinâmica do Scorpio Classic utilizando simulações CFD")
Melhoria aerodinâmica do Scorpio Classic utilizando simulações CFD29,99 €![Heat Enhancement Techniques by using Aerodynamic Bead Shape in a Hex]( "Heat Enhancement Techniques by using Aerodynamic Bead Shape in a Hex")
Heat Enhancement Techniques by using Aerodynamic Bead Shape in a Hex36,99 €![Aerodynamic Analysis on a Passenger Car]( "Aerodynamic Analysis on a Passenger Car")
Aerodynamic Analysis on a Passenger Car27,99 €
This study investigates the aerodynamic performance of the 2013 Scorpio Classic using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations in ANSYS Fluent. A baseline 2D model was developed and analyzed for drag and lift coefficients, followed by a modified design incorporating a boat tail angle at the rear underbody. The simulations were conducted at an inlet velocity of 27.7 m/s with the SST k- turbulence model. Results show that the modified model achieved a notable reduction in aerodynamic drag and lift compared to the base model. Specifically, the drag coefficient decreased from 3.45 (base model) to 2.95 (Model 1), while the lift coefficient reduced from 2.80 to 2.40, indicating enhanced stability and fuel efficiency potential. The findings demonstrate that strategic modifications, such as rear underbody optimization, can significantly improve vehicle aerodynamic efficiency. This work underscores the importance of CFD-based design approaches in automotive aerodynamics and provides insights for future design optimization.