Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Air Force Strategy Study 2020-2030]( "Air Force Strategy Study 2020-2030")
Air Force Strategy Study 2020-203029,99 €![Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process]( "Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process")
Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process28,99 €![Air National Guard Structure for the Twenty-First Century]( "Air National Guard Structure for the Twenty-First Century")
Air National Guard Structure for the Twenty-First Century28,99 €![Army's Counterintelligence Role in Homeland Defense]( "Army's Counterintelligence Role in Homeland Defense")
Army's Counterintelligence Role in Homeland Defense28,99 €![Noncombatant Evacuation Operations Decision-Making Process Effects on Efficiency]( "Noncombatant Evacuation Operations Decision-Making Process Effects on Efficiency")
Noncombatant Evacuation Operations Decision-Making Process Effects on Efficiency25,99 €![Organizational Anomaly of US Army Strategic Counterintelligence]( "Organizational Anomaly of US Army Strategic Counterintelligence")
Organizational Anomaly of US Army Strategic Counterintelligence27,99 €![A New Vector for Air Force Development of Joint Leaders]( "A New Vector for Air Force Development of Joint Leaders")
A New Vector for Air Force Development of Joint Leaders27,99 €
Air Force information operations doctrine includes public affairs among the various components of influence operations, which is one of the three major elements of information operations. In contrast, joint doctrine segregates public affairs and information operations, with the former serving as a related capability to the latter. Due to the inherent conflict between the core purposes of public affairs and influence operations, the Air Force approach poses a risk to the effectiveness of public affairs programs and activities, and may ultimately undermine the fundamental principle of civilian control of the military. Therefore, the Air Force should amend its doctrine to explicitly separate public affairs and influence operations, and ensure its operational concepts draw clear distinctions between these similar but separate spheres of military communication. This paper argues in favor of this course of action by summarizing the changes in the global information and security environment that have prompted the need to reexamine operational concepts involved in public affairs and influence operations, then identifying the essential purpose of the public affairs and influence operations, respectively, and the contradictions created by forcing public affairs into the influence operations yoke. Based on those contradictions, it advocates erecting clear and doctrinal boundaries between these distinct albeit related missions in order to better accomplish them, as well as to better honor and preserve the values underlying the civilian-military relationship fundamental to American democracy. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.