Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Military Transition to Contractors]( "Military Transition to Contractors")
Military Transition to Contractors25,99 €![Determining the Military Value of Army Installations During Base Realignment and Closure]( "Determining the Military Value of Army Installations During Base Realignment and Closure")
Determining the Military Value of Army Installations During Base Realignment and Closure28,99 €![Defense Management]( "Defense Management")
Defense Management25,99 €![Contractor Support]( "Contractor Support")
Contractor Support27,99 €![The Impact of the Packard Commission's Recommendations on Reducing Cost Overruns in Major Defense Acquisitions Programs]( "The Impact of the Packard Commission's Recommendations on Reducing Cost Overruns in Major Defense Acquisitions Programs")
The Impact of the Packard Commission's Recommendations on Reducing Cost Overruns in Major Defense Acquisitions Programs28,99 €![An Analysis of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act and the Clinger-Cohen Act and Their Effect on Cost Overruns in Department of Defense Contracts]( "An Analysis of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act and the Clinger-Cohen Act and Their Effect on Cost Overruns in Department of Defense Contracts")
An Analysis of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act and the Clinger-Cohen Act and Their Effect on Cost Overruns in Department of Defense Contracts27,99 €![Defense Infrastructure]( "Defense Infrastructure")
Defense Infrastructure28,99 €
The U.S. military's system of duplicative and competitive active duty recruiting contributes to and perpetuates the failure of DOD-wide recruiting efforts. Given the significant changes in the U.S. economy, and the relinquishment of market-share by the military services associated with the military drawdown of the 1990s, the military's present recruiting strategy will no longer fulfill DOD's personnel readiness requirements. The Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine recruiting forces have tried in vain to increase individual service market-share and the DOD-wide share within the greater employment market. Single-service efforts ostensibly aimed at increasing service market share predominantly impact upon other military services. Current marketing strategies and operations that are redundant and inefficient often cost the DOD more than the value gained in enlistment production increases. Small unit sales tactics and recruiting procedures encourage additional waste through the duplication of recruiting effort and negative military advertising. This monograph concludes that DOD must modify the flawed recruiting strategy if it is to avoid the continuous erosion of personnel readiness into the future. Development and adoption of DOD-wide marketing processes would enhance recruiting force efficiency through effective distribution. The management of prospecting and telemarketing efforts must be centralized and commercialized to enhance recruiter productivity and minimize redundant or high pressure prospecting techniques. Finally, Parallel and competitive recruiting organizations must consolidate to eliminate internal friction. Military readiness is the bill-payer for the inefficient and internally destructive recruiting systems allowed for under Title 10. The Secretary of Defense must exercise his authority under that same body of law to eliminate the destructive competition resident in the parallel recruiting systems of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.