Dieter GrimmBetween Law and Politics
Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review
Between Law and Politics
Herausgeber: Barzun, Charles; Klatt, Matthias; Visser, Maartje De
Versandkostenfrei innerhalb Deutschlands
66,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Erscheint vorauss. 4. Juni 2026
Melden Sie sich
hier
hier
für den Produktalarm an, um über die Verfügbarkeit des Produkts informiert zu werden.
33 °P sammeln
Dieter GrimmBetween Law and Politics
Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review
Between Law and Politics
Herausgeber: Barzun, Charles; Klatt, Matthias; Visser, Maartje De
- Broschiertes Buch
A collection of essays from Dieter Grimm, Germany's most renowned constitutional scholar, shining a light on the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Social Rights and the Constitutional Moment: Learning from Chile and International Experiences62,99 €
Keith C WhittingtonJudicial Review and Constitutional Politics13,99 €
Edward McwhinneyJudicial Review in the English-Speaking World41,99 €
Xin HeThe Judicial System of China30,99 €
Courts and Comparative Law96,99 €
Rosalind DixonResponsive Judicial Review40,99 €
Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts40,99 €-
-
-
A collection of essays from Dieter Grimm, Germany's most renowned constitutional scholar, shining a light on the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Academic
- Seitenzahl: 312
- Erscheinungstermin: 4. Juni 2026
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 454g
- ISBN-13: 9781509976898
- ISBN-10: 1509976892
- Artikelnr.: 74683191
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Academic
- Seitenzahl: 312
- Erscheinungstermin: 4. Juni 2026
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 454g
- ISBN-13: 9781509976898
- ISBN-10: 1509976892
- Artikelnr.: 74683191
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
Dieter Grimm is an internationally renowned authority on constitutional law, constitutional theory, constitutional history and constitutional adjudication, Germany.
Part I: A Prelude
1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany: A Survey
Part II: Judicial Review and Democracy
2. Constitutional Adjudication in a Democratic System
3. Neither Indispensable Nor Contradictory. Constitutional Adjudication and
Democracy
Part III: Constitutional Adjudication: Law or Politics?
4. What Exactly is Political about Constitutional Adjudication?
5. Law or Politics? The Kelsen-Schmitt Controversy Over Constitutional
Adjudication and the Current Situation
Part IV: The Process: Constitutional Interpretation
6. Constitutions, Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation
at the Interface of Law and Politics
7. On the Relationship between Interpretation Theory, Constitutional
Adjudication and the Democracy Principle in Kelsen
8. Habermas on Constitutional Jurisprudence
9. Behind the Scenes: The Genesis of the Elfes Judgment
10. Constitutional Jurisprudence and Constitutional Scholarship
Part V: Institutional Questions
11. Problems Relating to the System of Specialised Constitutional Courts in
Germany
12. On the Relationship between the Federal Constitutional Court and
Ordinary Courts
Part VI: Europe: Competing Courts
13. The Role of National Constitutional Courts in European Democracy
14. A Long Time Coming
Part VII: Opponents
15. New Radical Criticism of Constitutional Adjudication
1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany: A Survey
Part II: Judicial Review and Democracy
2. Constitutional Adjudication in a Democratic System
3. Neither Indispensable Nor Contradictory. Constitutional Adjudication and
Democracy
Part III: Constitutional Adjudication: Law or Politics?
4. What Exactly is Political about Constitutional Adjudication?
5. Law or Politics? The Kelsen-Schmitt Controversy Over Constitutional
Adjudication and the Current Situation
Part IV: The Process: Constitutional Interpretation
6. Constitutions, Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation
at the Interface of Law and Politics
7. On the Relationship between Interpretation Theory, Constitutional
Adjudication and the Democracy Principle in Kelsen
8. Habermas on Constitutional Jurisprudence
9. Behind the Scenes: The Genesis of the Elfes Judgment
10. Constitutional Jurisprudence and Constitutional Scholarship
Part V: Institutional Questions
11. Problems Relating to the System of Specialised Constitutional Courts in
Germany
12. On the Relationship between the Federal Constitutional Court and
Ordinary Courts
Part VI: Europe: Competing Courts
13. The Role of National Constitutional Courts in European Democracy
14. A Long Time Coming
Part VII: Opponents
15. New Radical Criticism of Constitutional Adjudication
Part I: A Prelude
1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany: A Survey
Part II: Judicial Review and Democracy
2. Constitutional Adjudication in a Democratic System
3. Neither Indispensable Nor Contradictory. Constitutional Adjudication and
Democracy
Part III: Constitutional Adjudication: Law or Politics?
4. What Exactly is Political about Constitutional Adjudication?
5. Law or Politics? The Kelsen-Schmitt Controversy Over Constitutional
Adjudication and the Current Situation
Part IV: The Process: Constitutional Interpretation
6. Constitutions, Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation
at the Interface of Law and Politics
7. On the Relationship between Interpretation Theory, Constitutional
Adjudication and the Democracy Principle in Kelsen
8. Habermas on Constitutional Jurisprudence
9. Behind the Scenes: The Genesis of the Elfes Judgment
10. Constitutional Jurisprudence and Constitutional Scholarship
Part V: Institutional Questions
11. Problems Relating to the System of Specialised Constitutional Courts in
Germany
12. On the Relationship between the Federal Constitutional Court and
Ordinary Courts
Part VI: Europe: Competing Courts
13. The Role of National Constitutional Courts in European Democracy
14. A Long Time Coming
Part VII: Opponents
15. New Radical Criticism of Constitutional Adjudication
1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany: A Survey
Part II: Judicial Review and Democracy
2. Constitutional Adjudication in a Democratic System
3. Neither Indispensable Nor Contradictory. Constitutional Adjudication and
Democracy
Part III: Constitutional Adjudication: Law or Politics?
4. What Exactly is Political about Constitutional Adjudication?
5. Law or Politics? The Kelsen-Schmitt Controversy Over Constitutional
Adjudication and the Current Situation
Part IV: The Process: Constitutional Interpretation
6. Constitutions, Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation
at the Interface of Law and Politics
7. On the Relationship between Interpretation Theory, Constitutional
Adjudication and the Democracy Principle in Kelsen
8. Habermas on Constitutional Jurisprudence
9. Behind the Scenes: The Genesis of the Elfes Judgment
10. Constitutional Jurisprudence and Constitutional Scholarship
Part V: Institutional Questions
11. Problems Relating to the System of Specialised Constitutional Courts in
Germany
12. On the Relationship between the Federal Constitutional Court and
Ordinary Courts
Part VI: Europe: Competing Courts
13. The Role of National Constitutional Courts in European Democracy
14. A Long Time Coming
Part VII: Opponents
15. New Radical Criticism of Constitutional Adjudication







