Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The problem of the kuluna phenomenon in the DRC: the case of the city of Matadi]( "The problem of the kuluna phenomenon in the DRC: the case of the city of Matadi")
The problem of the kuluna phenomenon in the DRC: the case of the city of Matadi29,99 €![The problem of access to justice in the DRC: the case of the indigent]( "The problem of access to justice in the DRC: the case of the indigent")
The problem of access to justice in the DRC: the case of the indigent29,99 €![The Fiscal System of the DRC: Analysis and Perspectives]( "The Fiscal System of the DRC: Analysis and Perspectives")
The Fiscal System of the DRC: Analysis and Perspectives18,99 €![OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION AND THE INTANGIBILITY OF ARTICLE 220]( "OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION AND THE INTANGIBILITY OF ARTICLE 220")
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION AND THE INTANGIBILITY OF ARTICLE 22027,99 €![The legislative function of the constitutional judge in Black Africa]( "The legislative function of the constitutional judge in Black Africa")
The legislative function of the constitutional judge in Black Africa40,99 €![Direct applicability of the Rome Statute]( "Direct applicability of the Rome Statute")
Direct applicability of the Rome Statute29,99 €![The evolution of the concept of possession]( "The evolution of the concept of possession")
The evolution of the concept of possession29,99 €
The Democratic Republic of Congo, like all constitutional states, relies on a constitution that organizes power, guarantees rights and defines institutions. Since the adoption of the constitution on February 18, 2006, calls for its reform have multiplied. This reform raises a major debate: should we proceed with a constitutional revision (in accordance with the procedures laid down in the text) or with a constitutional change (creation of a new legal order)? The debate opposes two visions: revision: to correct certain provisions while preserving the spirit of the current constitution; change: to endow the country with a new constitution, which could call into question the legal order.