Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet]( "Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet")
Collaborative, Trust-Based Security Mechanisms for a National Utility Intranet22,99 €![Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession]( "Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession")
Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession52,99 €![Breaking the Mold]( "Breaking the Mold")
Breaking the Mold15,99 €![Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni]( "Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni")
Unfair Competition: A Study of Certain Practices and Their Relation to the Trust Problems in the Uni21,99 €![Copy Of The Trust-deed & Statutes Of Saint Michael's College, Tenbury]( "Copy Of The Trust-deed & Statutes Of Saint Michael's College, Tenbury")
Copy Of The Trust-deed & Statutes Of Saint Michael's College, Tenbury15,99 €![Trust and Partnering with the Joint Team]( "Trust and Partnering with the Joint Team")
Trust and Partnering with the Joint Team52,99 €![Applying Lessons of Trust in Future Command Arrangements]( "Applying Lessons of Trust in Future Command Arrangements")
Applying Lessons of Trust in Future Command Arrangements14,99 €
It should be no surprise that Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. Air Force (USAF) networks are the target of constant attack. As a result, network defense remains a high priority for cyber warriors. On the technical side, trust issues for a comprehensive end-to-end network defense solution are abundant and involve multiple layers of complexity. The Air Force Research Labs (AFRL) is currently investigating the feasibility of a holistic approach to network defense, called Cybercraft. We envision Cybercraft to be trusted computer entities that cooperate with other Cybercraft to provide autonomous and responsive network defense services. A top research goal related to Cybercraft centers around how we may examine and ultimately prove features related to this root of trust. In this work, we investigate use-case scenarios for Cybercraft operation with a view towards analyzing and expressing trust requirements inherent in the environment. Based on a limited subset of functional requirements for Cybercraft in terms of their role, we consider how current trust models may be used to answer various questions of trust between components. We characterize generic model components that assist in answering questions regarding Cybercraft trust and pose relevant comparison criteria as evaluation points for various (existing) trust models. The contribution of this research is a framework for comparing trust models that are applicable to similar network-based architectures. Ultimately, we provide a reference evaluation framework for how (current and future) trust models may be developed or integrated into the Cybercraft architecture. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.