Nicht lieferbar
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Military Air Power: The CADRE Digest of Air Power Opinions and Thoughts]( "Military Air Power: The CADRE Digest of Air Power Opinions and Thoughts")
Military Air Power: The CADRE Digest of Air Power Opinions and Thoughts53,99 €![Air and Space Power: Securing the Foundations]( "Air and Space Power: Securing the Foundations")
Air and Space Power: Securing the Foundations52,99 €![The Quest for Security: The Space-Based Missile Defense Debate]( "The Quest for Security: The Space-Based Missile Defense Debate")
The Quest for Security: The Space-Based Missile Defense Debate52,99 €![The]( "The")
The "Space" of Aerospace Power: Why and How52,99 €![Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence]( "Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence")
Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence52,99 €![Toward an Air and Space Force: Can We Get There from Here? Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power]( "Toward an Air and Space Force: Can We Get There from Here? Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power")
Toward an Air and Space Force: Can We Get There from Here? Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power52,99 €![Toward an Air and Space Force: Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power]( "Toward an Air and Space Force: Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power")
Toward an Air and Space Force: Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power52,99 €
Air Force General Charles "Chuck" Horner, former commander of U.S. Space Command, advocates the creation of an independent Space Force, separate from the Air Force. Justifications for such a change depend in large measure on whether space power can provide a way of fighting and winning wars distinct from that provided by the other services. An important aspect of this issue is whether differences between air power and space power suggest a rationale for a separate and independent Space Force. It has been said that space is at a crossroads. We cannot afford to wait for the next war to show us if space power will, as air power did, revolutionize the conduct of warfare. We cannot make such a decision based on vague allegories to the air power debate. A more rigorous approach is required. This paper sheds light on this question from the perspective of doctrine and theory and seeks to suggest the next steps in keeping the U.S. approach to space "from being too badly wrong." This research project critically compares air and space power in order to discern whether the differences between air and space power suggest a paradigm shift in the way wars will be fought. As a foundation for comparison, air and space power are exposed in terms of features of the mediums, characteristics of the forces, and tenets of employing forces in each medium. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.