Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Environmental Organizations and Reasoned Discourse]( "Environmental Organizations and Reasoned Discourse")
Environmental Organizations and Reasoned Discourse113,99 €![Environmental Advocacy and Local Restorations]( "Environmental Advocacy and Local Restorations")
Environmental Advocacy and Local Restorations106,99 €![Players in the Public Policy Process]( "Players in the Public Policy Process")
Players in the Public Policy Process38,99 €![The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe]( "The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe")
The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe38,99 €![The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe]( "The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe")
The Political Economy of Normative Trade Power Europe38,99 €![Making Renewable Electricity Policy in Spain]( "Making Renewable Electricity Policy in Spain")
Making Renewable Electricity Policy in Spain91,99 €![Varieties of Political Consumerism]( "Varieties of Political Consumerism")
Varieties of Political Consumerism49,99 €
This book explores the meaning and role of "fair and reasoned discourse" in the
context of our institutions for environmental decision processes. The book
reviews the roles of our "environmental advocacy organizations"-such as The
Sierra Club, The Audubon Society, the Environmental Defense Fund-in providing
and ensuring that our discourse and decisions are fair and reasoned according to
the criteria of being (i) inclusive of input from all affected, (ii) informed of relevant
scientific and socio-economic information, (iii) uncorrupted by direct conflicts of
interest, and (iv) logical according robust review by uncorrupted judges. These
organizations are described and examined as expressions of "collective imperfect
duty," i.e. the coordinated duties with environmental direction. The current state
of our discourse is examined in light of this fairness criteria, particularly in
consideration of the cross-border problems that threaten tragedies of the global
commons.
context of our institutions for environmental decision processes. The book
reviews the roles of our "environmental advocacy organizations"-such as The
Sierra Club, The Audubon Society, the Environmental Defense Fund-in providing
and ensuring that our discourse and decisions are fair and reasoned according to
the criteria of being (i) inclusive of input from all affected, (ii) informed of relevant
scientific and socio-economic information, (iii) uncorrupted by direct conflicts of
interest, and (iv) logical according robust review by uncorrupted judges. These
organizations are described and examined as expressions of "collective imperfect
duty," i.e. the coordinated duties with environmental direction. The current state
of our discourse is examined in light of this fairness criteria, particularly in
consideration of the cross-border problems that threaten tragedies of the global
commons.