Keown, John, DCL (Washington DC Georgetown University)
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy
Keown, John, DCL (Washington DC Georgetown University)
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
The book explains to the reader (general or specialist) the powerful 'slippery slope' arguments against legalising 'assisted dying'. Drawing on the experience of legalisation in the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon, it shows that 'assisted dying' cannot be effectively controlled by law.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Jonathan Herring (Professor of Law, Professor of Law, Exeter CollegMedical Law and Ethics45,99 €
Terry PratchettShaking Hands With Death12,99 €
Robin FeldmanDrugs, Money, and Secret Handshakes21,99 €
Eric R. BootThe Ethics of Whistleblowing22,99 €
Dr. Casey MeansGood Energy13,99 €
Dr. Casey MeansGood Energy20,99 €
Dien HoA Philosopher Goes to the Doctor53,99 €-
-
-
The book explains to the reader (general or specialist) the powerful 'slippery slope' arguments against legalising 'assisted dying'. Drawing on the experience of legalisation in the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon, it shows that 'assisted dying' cannot be effectively controlled by law.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- 2 Revised edition
- Seitenzahl: 560
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. März 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 888g
- ISBN-13: 9781107618336
- ISBN-10: 1107618339
- Artikelnr.: 53019046
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- 2 Revised edition
- Seitenzahl: 560
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. März 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 888g
- ISBN-13: 9781107618336
- ISBN-10: 1107618339
- Artikelnr.: 53019046
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
John Keown is a leading and widely-published authority on the law and ethics of medicine. Before being appointed to the Rose Kennedy Chair in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown, he taught medical law in the Faculty of Law at Cambridge. In 2015 he was made a Doctor of Civil Law by Oxford for his contribution to law and bioethics. A focus of his research, which has been cited by the Law Lords and by the US Supreme Court, has been the law and practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands. That research formed the centrepiece to the first edition of this work, which was widely acclaimed.
Part I. Definitions: 1. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
Part I. Definitions: 1. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.







