Nicht lieferbar
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
The Army's transformation to the brigade combat team (BCT) as its primary combat employment unit has come at the cost of reduced organic firepower and armor under the modular force concept. As a result, greater emphasis and dependence will likely be placed upon fixed-wing fires in support of the BCT. Simultaneously, Air Force aircraft continue to experience reduced mission capable (MC) rates due to sustained combat operations and airframe fatigue. The Air Force is acquiring new tactical airframes while recapitalizing and retiring others, but at a projected rate less than a 1:1 replacement ratio. Presented in this thesis is an integrated force ratio model to quantify both Army requirements and Air Force capacity to support those requirements. A modified case study using Desert Storm provides a context for the practical application of this model in determining future force requirements for both services and to answer the primary research question: Can the Air Force provide sufficient support to the BCTs engaged in major combat operations (MCO)? Recommendations include re-evaluating Army modularity assumptions for non-organic joint fires support as well as a dedicated, combined approach between the Air Force and Army to jointly evaluate force structure and acquisition decisions. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.