Nicht lieferbar
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![How to Write Professional Academic Research Proposals]( "How to Write Professional Academic Research Proposals")
How to Write Professional Academic Research Proposals55,99 €![How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences]( "How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences")
How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences29,99 €![How to write what you want to say ...]( "How to write what you want to say ...")
How to write what you want to say ...12,99 €![From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond]( "From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond")
From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond68,99 €![The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Thinkers]( "The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Thinkers")
The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Thinkers635,99 €![From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond]( "From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond")
From Socrates to Summerhill and Beyond114,99 €![How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences]( "How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences")
How to Write a PhD in Biological Sciences62,99 €
The title of this essay is likely to make it sound as though the following is going to be another one of those self-help 'how to' books that we are nowadays bombarded with in bookshops. And in a way that's what it is - only worse, since the author obviously doesn't know what he is talking about. For isn't this supposed to be philosophy? Yet surely the body of this essay couldn't even be close to whatever the author is going to tell us would be the written equivalent to Socratic philosophising (I don't see any dialogues)? Or, if that is what he intends to make us believe, then how boring it looks; just another useless theory. However, if this is not what he is going to say, then again it seems that the author doesn't know what he is talking (or writing) about.-Or could there be a difference between kinds of philosophy, or different ways of writing philosophy?