Nicht lieferbar
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Rosecrans' Staff at Chickamauga: The Significance of Major General William S. Rosecrans' Staff on the Outcome of the Chickamauga Campaign]( "Rosecrans' Staff at Chickamauga: The Significance of Major General William S. Rosecrans' Staff on the Outcome of the Chickamauga Campaign")
Rosecrans' Staff at Chickamauga: The Significance of Major General William S. Rosecrans' Staff on the Outcome of the Chickamauga Campaign52,99 €![Innovation in the Face of Adversity: Major-General Sir Percy Hobart and the 79th Armoured Division (British)]( "Innovation in the Face of Adversity: Major-General Sir Percy Hobart and the 79th Armoured Division (British)")
Innovation in the Face of Adversity: Major-General Sir Percy Hobart and the 79th Armoured Division (British)52,99 €![Analysis of the Current Concept for Employment of the Airmobile Division Against Insurgent Forces in an Underdeveloped Area, Part 1]( "Analysis of the Current Concept for Employment of the Airmobile Division Against Insurgent Forces in an Underdeveloped Area, Part 1")
Analysis of the Current Concept for Employment of the Airmobile Division Against Insurgent Forces in an Underdeveloped Area, Part 152,99 €![Setting Sun: A Critical Analysis of Japan's Employment of Naval Airpower in the Battle of the Coral Sea]( "Setting Sun: A Critical Analysis of Japan's Employment of Naval Airpower in the Battle of the Coral Sea")
Setting Sun: A Critical Analysis of Japan's Employment of Naval Airpower in the Battle of the Coral Sea52,99 €![100/442d Regimental Combat Team's Rescue of the Lost Battalion: A Study in the Employment of Battle Command]( "100/442d Regimental Combat Team's Rescue of the Lost Battalion: A Study in the Employment of Battle Command")
100/442d Regimental Combat Team's Rescue of the Lost Battalion: A Study in the Employment of Battle Command52,99 €![Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga]( "Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga")
Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga52,99 €![Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg]( "Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg")
Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg52,99 €
This thesis is a historical analysis of Major General Philip H. Sheridan and his division during the Battle of Chickamauga. Sheridan led an experienced division onto the battlefield on 19 September 1863 after completing a march of over one hundred miles over mountainous terrain the previous seventeen days. The division was deployed by brigade to protect the Union right flank. One brigade took heavy casualties the first day, when attacking to repel an enemy advance. On the second day, while moving to reinforce Major General Thomas' corps, the division was routed when Confederate forces attacked through a gap in the Union defense. Sheridan rallied his men, but inexplicably left the battlefield instead of returning to reinforce Thomas' right flank as ordered. Sheridan later moved to reinforce Thomas' left flank, after the battle was over. Sheridan's performance was uncharacteristic for him, particularly his decision to leave the battlefield. Sheridan was not the subject of an official inquiry after the battle, although his actions were similar to other officers who were. Based on the analysis of the division's actions, this study draws conclusions to determine the causes for the unit's poor performance at Chickamauga: poor decision making, fatigue, and piecemeal employment. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.