Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Conceptions of personhood. Can the idea of individual responsibility remain morally relevant?]( "Conceptions of personhood. Can the idea of individual responsibility remain morally relevant?")
Conceptions of personhood. Can the idea of individual responsibility remain morally relevant?15,95 €![Wilsonianism Then and Now. Would The Real Woodrow Wilson Please Stand Up]( "Wilsonianism Then and Now. Would The Real Woodrow Wilson Please Stand Up")
Wilsonianism Then and Now. Would The Real Woodrow Wilson Please Stand Up17,95 €![Anarchist Critique of Radical Democracy]( "Anarchist Critique of Radical Democracy")
Anarchist Critique of Radical Democracy41,99 €![Precarious Life]( "Precarious Life")
Precarious Life8,99 €![The Lockean Commonwealth]( "The Lockean Commonwealth")
The Lockean Commonwealth93,99 €![The Internet and its role in global politics]( "The Internet and its role in global politics")
The Internet and its role in global politics17,95 €![Lockean Property Ethics and Restitution]( "Lockean Property Ethics and Restitution")
Lockean Property Ethics and Restitution173,99 €
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 4.00, Indiana University (College of Arts and Sciences - Political Science Department), course: POLS-Y210 Rule of Law, language: English, abstract: This paper seeks to argue that the notion of executive prerogative forwarded by John Locke as a necessary political tool for a sovereign to exercise in times of national emergency is not practically or theoretically suitable in a modern context. Furthermore, the paper seeks to reveal a theoretical tension between Locke's idea of executive prerogative and more valuable foundational political ideas such natural rights and social contract theory.