Andrew Choo
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Criminal Justice
Andrew Choo
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Criminal Justice
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This book examines the operation of the privilege against self-incrimination in England and Wales, paying particular attention to the influence of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998 on the development of the principle.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Dr Stijn Lamberigts (Belgium Lydian)Corporations and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination70,99 €
Dr Stijn Lamberigts (Belgium Lydian)Corporations and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination105,99 €
Sophie WilliamsAnti-Racist Ally8,99 €
Stefanie K. JohnsonInclusify28,99 €
Sophie WilliamsAnti-Racist Ally18,99 €
Patrick NessAnd the Ocean Was Our Sky16,99 €
Tahereh MafiAn Emotion of Great Delight7,49 €-
-
-
This book examines the operation of the privilege against self-incrimination in England and Wales, paying particular attention to the influence of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998 on the development of the principle.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Criminal Law Library
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Seitenzahl: 182
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. November 2013
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 240mm x 161mm x 15mm
- Gewicht: 432g
- ISBN-13: 9781841133171
- ISBN-10: 1841133175
- Artikelnr.: 39049285
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Criminal Law Library
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Seitenzahl: 182
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. November 2013
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 240mm x 161mm x 15mm
- Gewicht: 432g
- ISBN-13: 9781841133171
- ISBN-10: 1841133175
- Artikelnr.: 39049285
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
Andrew Choo is a Professor of Law at City University London and a barrister at Matrix Chambers.
1. Introduction: Origins, Rationales and the Relevant Legal Framework
1. Origins and Rationales
1.1 Epistemic Considerations
1.2 Non-Epistemic Considerations
2. The Relevant Legal Framework
2.1 The Context: A 'Social' or 'Moral' Duty of Co-operation
2.2 Some General Principles
3. Organisation of the Book
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Response
of the Law of England and Wales
1. Funke v France
2. Saunders v UK
3. Prosecutions for Failure to Provide (Accurate) Information
3.1 The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Post-Funke v
France
3.2 The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Use of 'Compelled Information'
4.1 'Use Immunity'
4.2 Is There a Principle of 'Derivative-Use Immunity'?
4.3 Is the Information 'Compelled Information'?
5. Concluding Comments
3. What Is 'Information'?
1. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
2. The Case Law in England and Wales
3. US Constitutional Law
3.1 Voice
3.2 Handwriting
3.3 Sobriety Testing
4. Australia
5. New Zealand
6. Canada
7. India
8. International Criminal Law: The ICTY
9. Concluding Comments
4. Identifying the 'Essence' of the Privilege
1. An 'Absolute' Right?
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
3. The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Canada
5. Concluding Comments
5. 'Indirect' Compulsion: Confessions and Inferences From Silence
1. Questioning Suspects
1.1 Mandatory Exclusion and Mandatory Directions
1.2 Legal Advice
1.3 Cautioning Suspects
1.4 Alternatives to Judicial Discretion
1.5 Police Informants
1.6 'Safety Interviews'
2. Adverse Inferences From Silence
2.1 Pre-Trial Silence
2.2 Silence at Trial
3. Concluding Comments
6. Concluding Thoughts
1. Origins and Rationales
1.1 Epistemic Considerations
1.2 Non-Epistemic Considerations
2. The Relevant Legal Framework
2.1 The Context: A 'Social' or 'Moral' Duty of Co-operation
2.2 Some General Principles
3. Organisation of the Book
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Response
of the Law of England and Wales
1. Funke v France
2. Saunders v UK
3. Prosecutions for Failure to Provide (Accurate) Information
3.1 The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Post-Funke v
France
3.2 The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Use of 'Compelled Information'
4.1 'Use Immunity'
4.2 Is There a Principle of 'Derivative-Use Immunity'?
4.3 Is the Information 'Compelled Information'?
5. Concluding Comments
3. What Is 'Information'?
1. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
2. The Case Law in England and Wales
3. US Constitutional Law
3.1 Voice
3.2 Handwriting
3.3 Sobriety Testing
4. Australia
5. New Zealand
6. Canada
7. India
8. International Criminal Law: The ICTY
9. Concluding Comments
4. Identifying the 'Essence' of the Privilege
1. An 'Absolute' Right?
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
3. The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Canada
5. Concluding Comments
5. 'Indirect' Compulsion: Confessions and Inferences From Silence
1. Questioning Suspects
1.1 Mandatory Exclusion and Mandatory Directions
1.2 Legal Advice
1.3 Cautioning Suspects
1.4 Alternatives to Judicial Discretion
1.5 Police Informants
1.6 'Safety Interviews'
2. Adverse Inferences From Silence
2.1 Pre-Trial Silence
2.2 Silence at Trial
3. Concluding Comments
6. Concluding Thoughts
1. Introduction: Origins, Rationales and the Relevant Legal Framework
1. Origins and Rationales
1.1 Epistemic Considerations
1.2 Non-Epistemic Considerations
2. The Relevant Legal Framework
2.1 The Context: A 'Social' or 'Moral' Duty of Co-operation
2.2 Some General Principles
3. Organisation of the Book
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Response
of the Law of England and Wales
1. Funke v France
2. Saunders v UK
3. Prosecutions for Failure to Provide (Accurate) Information
3.1 The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Post-Funke v
France
3.2 The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Use of 'Compelled Information'
4.1 'Use Immunity'
4.2 Is There a Principle of 'Derivative-Use Immunity'?
4.3 Is the Information 'Compelled Information'?
5. Concluding Comments
3. What Is 'Information'?
1. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
2. The Case Law in England and Wales
3. US Constitutional Law
3.1 Voice
3.2 Handwriting
3.3 Sobriety Testing
4. Australia
5. New Zealand
6. Canada
7. India
8. International Criminal Law: The ICTY
9. Concluding Comments
4. Identifying the 'Essence' of the Privilege
1. An 'Absolute' Right?
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
3. The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Canada
5. Concluding Comments
5. 'Indirect' Compulsion: Confessions and Inferences From Silence
1. Questioning Suspects
1.1 Mandatory Exclusion and Mandatory Directions
1.2 Legal Advice
1.3 Cautioning Suspects
1.4 Alternatives to Judicial Discretion
1.5 Police Informants
1.6 'Safety Interviews'
2. Adverse Inferences From Silence
2.1 Pre-Trial Silence
2.2 Silence at Trial
3. Concluding Comments
6. Concluding Thoughts
1. Origins and Rationales
1.1 Epistemic Considerations
1.2 Non-Epistemic Considerations
2. The Relevant Legal Framework
2.1 The Context: A 'Social' or 'Moral' Duty of Co-operation
2.2 Some General Principles
3. Organisation of the Book
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Response
of the Law of England and Wales
1. Funke v France
2. Saunders v UK
3. Prosecutions for Failure to Provide (Accurate) Information
3.1 The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Post-Funke v
France
3.2 The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Use of 'Compelled Information'
4.1 'Use Immunity'
4.2 Is There a Principle of 'Derivative-Use Immunity'?
4.3 Is the Information 'Compelled Information'?
5. Concluding Comments
3. What Is 'Information'?
1. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
2. The Case Law in England and Wales
3. US Constitutional Law
3.1 Voice
3.2 Handwriting
3.3 Sobriety Testing
4. Australia
5. New Zealand
6. Canada
7. India
8. International Criminal Law: The ICTY
9. Concluding Comments
4. Identifying the 'Essence' of the Privilege
1. An 'Absolute' Right?
2. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
3. The Case Law in England and Wales
4. Canada
5. Concluding Comments
5. 'Indirect' Compulsion: Confessions and Inferences From Silence
1. Questioning Suspects
1.1 Mandatory Exclusion and Mandatory Directions
1.2 Legal Advice
1.3 Cautioning Suspects
1.4 Alternatives to Judicial Discretion
1.5 Police Informants
1.6 'Safety Interviews'
2. Adverse Inferences From Silence
2.1 Pre-Trial Silence
2.2 Silence at Trial
3. Concluding Comments
6. Concluding Thoughts







