Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![An Introduction To Reflective Thinking]( "An Introduction To Reflective Thinking")
An Introduction To Reflective Thinking22,99 €![Research on Reflective Practice in TESOL]( "Research on Reflective Practice in TESOL")
Research on Reflective Practice in TESOL56,99 €![Educating Chinese-Heritage Students in the Global-Local Nexus]( "Educating Chinese-Heritage Students in the Global-Local Nexus")
Educating Chinese-Heritage Students in the Global-Local Nexus55,99 €![Teacher Professional Knowledge and Development for Reflective and Inclusive Practices]( "Teacher Professional Knowledge and Development for Reflective and Inclusive Practices")
Teacher Professional Knowledge and Development for Reflective and Inclusive Practices57,99 €![Action Research and Reflective Practice]( "Action Research and Reflective Practice")
Action Research and Reflective Practice50,99 €![International Students from Asia in Canadian Universities]( "International Students from Asia in Canadian Universities")
International Students from Asia in Canadian Universities54,99 €![Reflective Teacher Development in Primary Science]( "Reflective Teacher Development in Primary Science")
Reflective Teacher Development in Primary Science31,99 €
Reflective thinking (RT) is increasingly recognized as a vital competency in global education, yet its development and assessment in multilingual, intercultural contexts remain underexplored. This study examines how international students in Chinese universities engage in RT, both as a measurable cognitive construct and a lived, adaptive process shaped by emotional and cultural transitions. A sequential mixed-methods approach was employed to integrate psychometric validation with experiential insight. Survey data from 482 international students were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, confirming a robust four-factor model of the Reflective Thinking Scale (RTS): Habitual Action, Understanding, Reflection, and Critical Reflection. The RTS demonstrated strong internal consistency (¿ = .77) and high test-retest reliability (r = .83). Significant differences across gender and academic level suggest demographic influences on reflective capacity. Qualitative data from reflective journals and semi-structured interviews revealed four key themes: navigating academic and cultural dissonance, evolving reflective practices, emotional resilience, and identity negotiation in intercultural settings.