Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Reviewing European Union Accession]( "Reviewing European Union Accession")
Reviewing European Union Accession235,99 €![Aiding and Abetting by Omission:Special Focus on Mode of Participation to the Crime of Extermination in the Rutaganira Case]( "Aiding and Abetting by Omission:Special Focus on Mode of Participation to the Crime of Extermination in the Rutaganira Case")
Aiding and Abetting by Omission:Special Focus on Mode of Participation to the Crime of Extermination in the Rutaganira Case78,00 €![Revisiting Victims' Participation at the ICC: Advocacy for an Efficient Restorative International Criminal Justice System]( "Revisiting Victims' Participation at the ICC: Advocacy for an Efficient Restorative International Criminal Justice System")
Revisiting Victims' Participation at the ICC: Advocacy for an Efficient Restorative International Criminal Justice System57,00 €![Ghana @ 60: Evolution of the Law, Democratic Governance, Human Rights and Future Prospects]( "Ghana @ 60: Evolution of the Law, Democratic Governance, Human Rights and Future Prospects")
Ghana @ 60: Evolution of the Law, Democratic Governance, Human Rights and Future Prospects49,00 €![Legal Environment, Human Rights Responsibility and Development in the Oil Industry]( "Legal Environment, Human Rights Responsibility and Development in the Oil Industry")
Legal Environment, Human Rights Responsibility and Development in the Oil Industry62,00 €![The Seller's Liability for the Non-Conformity of Goods to the Contract of Sale of Goods under the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law: Common Law Perspective]( "The Seller's Liability for the Non-Conformity of Goods to the Contract of Sale of Goods under the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law: Common Law Perspective")
The Seller's Liability for the Non-Conformity of Goods to the Contract of Sale of Goods under the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law: Common Law Perspective79,00 €![Immunities of African State Offcials and the Requests to cooperate pursuant to Warrants issued under the Rome Statute]( "Immunities of African State Offcials and the Requests to cooperate pursuant to Warrants issued under the Rome Statute")
Immunities of African State Offcials and the Requests to cooperate pursuant to Warrants issued under the Rome Statute65,00 €
The International Court of Justice case law has set a standard that meets international expectations as far as the principle of review is concerned, a standard that should not be deviated from, particularly when the laws guiding the said principle are similar to ICTR laws.Unfortunately, in the Barayagwiza case, the Appeals Chamber decision of 31.03.2000 on the prosecutor's request for review or reconsideration was reached contrary to the prescriptions of the ICTY rules and on untenable grounds.This research appeals to judges and other actors to put aside the Barayagwiza Appeal's decision and not to consider the said decision as a relevant authority as far as the concept of review is concerned.