Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![ICT: INTERCULTURAL TOOLS]( "ICT: INTERCULTURAL TOOLS")
ICT: INTERCULTURAL TOOLS64,99 €![Investigating Intercultural Communicative Competence among Students]( "Investigating Intercultural Communicative Competence among Students")
Investigating Intercultural Communicative Competence among Students33,99 €![Teacher Education in (Post-)Pandemic and (Post-)Digital Times]( "Teacher Education in (Post-)Pandemic and (Post-)Digital Times")
Teacher Education in (Post-)Pandemic and (Post-)Digital Times49,95 €![Interculturality in the Bachelor's Degree in Pedagogy]( "Interculturality in the Bachelor's Degree in Pedagogy")
Interculturality in the Bachelor's Degree in Pedagogy62,99 €![Interculturality and the Political within Education]( "Interculturality and the Political within Education")
Interculturality and the Political within Education17,99 €![The Paradoxes of Interculturality]( "The Paradoxes of Interculturality")
The Paradoxes of Interculturality18,99 €![Interculturality Online]( "Interculturality Online")
Interculturality Online127,99 €
The study provides a critical-interpretative analysis of Rodolpho Amoedo's museumified work "Marabá," focusing on understanding how the sexualized female body added symbolic representations to the Brazilian socio-cultural imagination of the 19th century, with its projections into contemporary themes. In light of Charles S. Peirce's semiotics, the reading of Marabá's sexualized female body as a territory of symbolic representations of the Brazilian socio-cultural imagination of the 19th century allows us to understand how the relationships between education, sexuality, and interculturality are projected onto contemporary subjects. It was concluded that the 19th-century body was ruled by the order of repression around sexuality, as a form of control and maintenance of the interests of dominant ideologies, and therefore a forbidden body, contrasting with the contemporary order of exhibiting the body, through a discourse of "freedom" or "anything goes," not as a locus of belonging, but as a symbolic place that, although it uses other indices, remains under the aegis of the discourse of order: control and maintenance of the interests of dominant ideologies.