Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![THE INTERFACE BETWEEN RISKS AND FARMER LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION]( "THE INTERFACE BETWEEN RISKS AND FARMER LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION")
THE INTERFACE BETWEEN RISKS AND FARMER LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION39,99 €![The Role of Nonfarm Activities on Income Generation to Rural household]( "The Role of Nonfarm Activities on Income Generation to Rural household")
The Role of Nonfarm Activities on Income Generation to Rural household32,99 €![Improving Commercial Banks' Retail Lending Activities]( "Improving Commercial Banks' Retail Lending Activities")
Improving Commercial Banks' Retail Lending Activities40,99 €![Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods]( "Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods")
Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods36,99 €![The Pattern of Livelihoods in a Typical Rural Village]( "The Pattern of Livelihoods in a Typical Rural Village")
The Pattern of Livelihoods in a Typical Rural Village32,99 €![Participatory Budgeting and Human Capabilities]( "Participatory Budgeting and Human Capabilities")
Participatory Budgeting and Human Capabilities32,99 €![Innovative strategies in unstable environments]( "Innovative strategies in unstable environments")
Innovative strategies in unstable environments53,99 €
A livelihood expresses the idea of an individual or group striving to make a living. It is an integral part of any development agenda since it highlights the realities on the ground. Livelihoods of a good proportion of the world population are poor. It is worse in Africa where most people derive their livelihoods from single sources, or hold their wealth in the form of just one asset. In Somaliland, the livelihoods of most people depend on agro-pastoralism, and subsistence agriculture. However, the livelihood status of households in Somaliland had not been surveyed. This study assessed the livelihoods of 66 households in Shirwac village. The study found that asset income 2 (6, N = 66) = 229.83, p = .000, land size 2 (3, N = 66) = 45.77, p = .000, land utilization 2 (4, N = 66) = 166.1, p = .000, and livestock assets 2 (4, N = 66) = 66.6, p = .000 were significantly poor. Livelihood capabilities 2 (4, N = 66) = 113.2, p = .000; and livelihood activities 2 (5, N = 66) = 83.3, p = .000), were also poor and had significant effect on livelihoods of the households. The study concludes that livelihoods of households in Shirwac village were generally poor.