Nicht lieferbar
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Toward a Universal Radio Frequency System for Special Operations Forces]( "Toward a Universal Radio Frequency System for Special Operations Forces")
Toward a Universal Radio Frequency System for Special Operations Forces20,99 €![Using Modeling and Simulation to Advance Effects-Based Security Forces Planning]( "Using Modeling and Simulation to Advance Effects-Based Security Forces Planning")
Using Modeling and Simulation to Advance Effects-Based Security Forces Planning49,99 €![U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations]( "U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations")
U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations15,99 €![Measuring Strategic Readiness]( "Measuring Strategic Readiness")
Measuring Strategic Readiness37,99 €![Assessing Locally Focused Stability Operations]( "Assessing Locally Focused Stability Operations")
Assessing Locally Focused Stability Operations25,99 €![Aligning Strategic Priorities and Foreign Military Sales to Fill Critical Capability Gaps]( "Aligning Strategic Priorities and Foreign Military Sales to Fill Critical Capability Gaps")
Aligning Strategic Priorities and Foreign Military Sales to Fill Critical Capability Gaps24,99 €![Building Afghanistan's Security Forces in Wartime]( "Building Afghanistan's Security Forces in Wartime")
Building Afghanistan's Security Forces in Wartime19,99 €
Researchers from RAND Corporation develop a new concept for strategic disruption by special operations forces, involving proactive campaigns to delay, degrade, or deny an adversary's ability to achieve core interests through its preferred strategies. This research provides a clear framework, grounded in concrete historical examples, for how strategic disruption campaigns can create the time, space, and opportunity for strategic gains across diplomatic, informational, military, and economic instruments of national power. For the special operations community, this research provides a rubric for how future campaigns can disrupt nation-state competitors' efforts to win without fighting, particularly when potentially escalatory options rooted in conventional deterrence are ill-suited or infeasible to achieve similar disruptive effects.