Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Familienplanungsschaden- Wrongful birth, wrongful life, wrongful conception, wrongful pregnancy]( "Familienplanungsschaden- Wrongful birth, wrongful life, wrongful conception, wrongful pregnancy")
Familienplanungsschaden- Wrongful birth, wrongful life, wrongful conception, wrongful pregnancy68,95 €![Courts, Corrections, and the Constitution]( "Courts, Corrections, and the Constitution")
Courts, Corrections, and the Constitution128,99 €![Judicial Politics]( "Judicial Politics")
Judicial Politics129,99 €![The Politics of Obscenity]( "The Politics of Obscenity")
The Politics of Obscenity87,99 €![Confidentiality, Transparency, and the U.S. Civil Justice System]( "Confidentiality, Transparency, and the U.S. Civil Justice System")
Confidentiality, Transparency, and the U.S. Civil Justice System150,99 €![The Plessy Case]( "The Plessy Case")
The Plessy Case90,99 €![Ideology in the Language of Judges]( "Ideology in the Language of Judges")
Ideology in the Language of Judges217,99 €
This is a study of the French Constitutional Council, a judicial body created at the dawn of the Fifth Republic which functioned in obscurity for almost two decades before emerging during the 1980s as a pivotal actor in the policy-making process.
The French Constitutional Council, a quasi-judicial body created at the dawn of the Fifth Republic, functioned in relative obscurity for almost two decades before emerging in the 1980s as a pivotal actor in the French policymaking process. Alec Stone focuses on how this once docile institution, through its practice of constitutional review, has become an important autonomous actor in the French political system. After examining the formal prohibition against judicial review in France, Stone illustrates how politicians and the Council have collaborated, often unintentionally and in the service of contradictory agendas, to enhance the Council's power significantly in the last decade. While the Council came to function as a third house of Parliament, the legislative work of the government and Parliament was "juridicized". Through a discussion of broad theoretical issues, Stone then expands the scope of his analysis to the politics of constitutional review in Germany, Spain, and Austria.
The French Constitutional Council, a quasi-judicial body created at the dawn of the Fifth Republic, functioned in relative obscurity for almost two decades before emerging in the 1980s as a pivotal actor in the French policymaking process. Alec Stone focuses on how this once docile institution, through its practice of constitutional review, has become an important autonomous actor in the French political system. After examining the formal prohibition against judicial review in France, Stone illustrates how politicians and the Council have collaborated, often unintentionally and in the service of contradictory agendas, to enhance the Council's power significantly in the last decade. While the Council came to function as a third house of Parliament, the legislative work of the government and Parliament was "juridicized". Through a discussion of broad theoretical issues, Stone then expands the scope of his analysis to the politics of constitutional review in Germany, Spain, and Austria.