This fascinating debunking of judicial supremacy argues that nonjudicial contributions to constitutional interpretation make the Constitution more stable, more consistent with constitutional principles, and more protective of individual and minority rights.
- An impressive affirmation of public participation in the political process - The first attempt to put together the full story of nonjudicial contributions in the interpretive process
- An impressive affirmation of public participation in the political process - The first attempt to put together the full story of nonjudicial contributions in the interpretive process







