18,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
9 °P sammeln
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The African Union and the resolution of the Central African crisis]( "The African Union and the resolution of the Central African crisis")
The African Union and the resolution of the Central African crisis26,99 €![Underdeveloped countries: the adaptability of public policy]( "Underdeveloped countries: the adaptability of public policy")
Underdeveloped countries: the adaptability of public policy40,99 €![The African Union]( "The African Union")
The African Union174,99 €![Imagining the United States of Africa]( "Imagining the United States of Africa")
Imagining the United States of Africa119,99 €![African Union]( "African Union")
African Union114,99 €![The Christian Right in the United States - Origin, Structure, and Political Activism]( "The Christian Right in the United States - Origin, Structure, and Political Activism")
The Christian Right in the United States - Origin, Structure, and Political Activism47,95 €![Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States]( "Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States")
Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States91,99 €
This text examines the differentiated occupation of administrative posts within the African Union. It starts from the observation that not all states are represented in the same way, despite the principle of sovereign equality that governs international organisations. He explores the hypothesis that the optimal occupation of posts within the African Union can be explained by the military strength of the member states. In other words, the stronger a state is militarily, the more administrative posts its nationals occupy within the African Union. Using both a quantitative and qualitative approach, he demonstrates that military strength influences the appointment and election of officials to this institution. In the light of these results, he validates the realist axiom of international anarchy while celebrating the marriage between realist and constructivist theories often presented as antinomic. Indeed, his results show that if certain states are over-represented within the Union,it is because their military strength gives them the necessary respect and esteem.