The fiercest battles over gender today aren't just about identity or womanhood-but about punishment, fear, and control The "gender wars" in Britain and beyond have been driven by a powerful and seductive narrative: that safety can be achieved through exclusion, surveillance, and the policing of difference. Punitive logics have gained momentum across the political spectrum, from ostensibly left feminist campaigns to far-right violence, fuelling a backlash against trans rights and distorting the meaning of safety itself. Unsafe is a clear-eyed and decisive challenge to the toxic ideas at the…mehr
The fiercest battles over gender today aren't just about identity or womanhood-but about punishment, fear, and control The "gender wars" in Britain and beyond have been driven by a powerful and seductive narrative: that safety can be achieved through exclusion, surveillance, and the policing of difference. Punitive logics have gained momentum across the political spectrum, from ostensibly left feminist campaigns to far-right violence, fuelling a backlash against trans rights and distorting the meaning of safety itself. Unsafe is a clear-eyed and decisive challenge to the toxic ideas at the heart of this backlash. With patient rigour, Lamble exposes how carceral solutions to safety always fail to address the root causes of harm and only deepen divisions within our communities. But Unsafe is more than critique. Drawing on abolitionist feminism and insights from grassroots organizing, Lamble makes a principled case for a different vision: one where safety isn't built on punishment but on collective care, radical solidarity and transformative justice.
Lamble is a community organizer and Professor of Criminology and Queer Theory at Birkbeck, University of London. Their work explores questions of gender, sexuality, and justice with a focus on feminist and abolitionist alternatives to prisons, police, and punishment. They are based in London.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction: Rethinking safety politics in the wake of the 'gender wars' Part I: The safety politics of the gender wars Unsafe: the rise of the "gender wars" in Britain Traces the manufacturing of a "trans danger" discourse, and how it was amplified by "gender critical" campaigners, politicians, and corporate media to escalate the gender wars in Britain. Weaponizing safety: the carceral politics of the "gender wars" Argues that carceral politics are a central factor in understanding how and why the gender wars escalated so rapidly in Britain, and makes the case for rethinking safety politics more broadly. How we got here: the neoliberal carceral roots of "bad man" feminism Traces a political shift in Britain from a broader critique of patriarchal structures to a narrower focus on the "violent man" as the new enemy of feminism, and shows "trans danger feminism" as an extension of this logic. Part II: Carceral politics don't keep us safe Dangerous others and the problem of sexual exceptionalism Argues that at the heart of narratives of dangerous sexual predators are logics of "sexual exceptionalism"-a framing that treats sexual violence as fundamentally distinct from other harms and people who commit sexual harm as inherently different from ordinary people. Why prisons, policing, and punishment don't make us safe Explains why a feminist abolitionist approach to safety is necessary to overcome the current impasse of the gender wars and the wider limits of existing safety politics. Part III: Building a transformative politics of safety From symbolic to material safety Makes the case that an abolitionist approach requires a refocus on the material conditions necessary for genuine safety, e.g. housing, health care, food security, and freedom of movement. From individual to collective safety Argues that an abolitionist approach to safety requires a reorientation from individual to collective agency. Safety through solidarity Explores what a politics of 'no one is disposable' means in practice, and how this politics can foster greater practices of safety and liberation for all. Conclusion: We keep us safe Summarizes the importance of building queer anti-carceral solidarities in both local and international contexts and the necessity of connecting struggles for gender justice with those of racial, economic, social, environmental, and anticolonial movements.
Introduction: Rethinking safety politics in the wake of the 'gender wars' Part I: The safety politics of the gender wars Unsafe: the rise of the "gender wars" in Britain Traces the manufacturing of a "trans danger" discourse, and how it was amplified by "gender critical" campaigners, politicians, and corporate media to escalate the gender wars in Britain. Weaponizing safety: the carceral politics of the "gender wars" Argues that carceral politics are a central factor in understanding how and why the gender wars escalated so rapidly in Britain, and makes the case for rethinking safety politics more broadly. How we got here: the neoliberal carceral roots of "bad man" feminism Traces a political shift in Britain from a broader critique of patriarchal structures to a narrower focus on the "violent man" as the new enemy of feminism, and shows "trans danger feminism" as an extension of this logic. Part II: Carceral politics don't keep us safe Dangerous others and the problem of sexual exceptionalism Argues that at the heart of narratives of dangerous sexual predators are logics of "sexual exceptionalism"-a framing that treats sexual violence as fundamentally distinct from other harms and people who commit sexual harm as inherently different from ordinary people. Why prisons, policing, and punishment don't make us safe Explains why a feminist abolitionist approach to safety is necessary to overcome the current impasse of the gender wars and the wider limits of existing safety politics. Part III: Building a transformative politics of safety From symbolic to material safety Makes the case that an abolitionist approach requires a refocus on the material conditions necessary for genuine safety, e.g. housing, health care, food security, and freedom of movement. From individual to collective safety Argues that an abolitionist approach to safety requires a reorientation from individual to collective agency. Safety through solidarity Explores what a politics of 'no one is disposable' means in practice, and how this politics can foster greater practices of safety and liberation for all. Conclusion: We keep us safe Summarizes the importance of building queer anti-carceral solidarities in both local and international contexts and the necessity of connecting struggles for gender justice with those of racial, economic, social, environmental, and anticolonial movements.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
