Accountability of Judicial Power (eBook, ePUB)

Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives
Redaktion: Mikuli, Piotr

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

This book brings together a group of international scholars to discuss theoretical and comparative considerations of judicial accountability in light of recent research, including studies on the crisis of the rule of law in the contemporary world. It provides a detailed consideration of specific accountability mechanisms.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis eBooks
• Erscheinungstermin: 29. April 2025
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781040355398
• Artikelnr.: 73634027

Autorenporträt

Piotr Mikuli is a full professor of law at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków.

Inhaltsangabe

1. Introduction: Conceptualizing Accountability of the Judiciary; Part I:
Theoretical Insights; 2. Accountability of the Judiciary as a
Constitutional Value; 3. Constitutional identity as an Actor of Judicial
Accountability; Part: II Standards; 4. EU standards regarding individual
accountability of judges; 5. Challenges of Disciplinary Liability of Judges
and Public Prosecutors; 6. In Search of Standards for Judicial Immunity;
Part III: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 7. Making Constitutional Judges
Accountable for Deliberating: Three Hypotheses and Possible Research; 8.
How to Hold Constitution's Defenders Accountable? Reflections on the
Specificity of the Constitutional Judges' Accountability; Part IV: Samples
of Accountability Mechanisms; 9. Autonomy and Boundedness as Internal
Values in the Practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union; 10.
Vetting as Judicial Integrity Enhancement Tool; 11. The Conundrum of
Judicial Accountability and Independence in Military Courts from a
Comparative Perspective; 12. Judicial Financial Autonomy: how the
Performance-based Budgeting Can Impact on Independence and Accountability
of Judges