Zhenyu Cai

Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality (eBook, ePUB)

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

Intentionality - how thoughts represent reality - lies at the heart of many contemporary philosophical questions in the philosophy of mind. Over the past twenty years, Avicenna's conception of intentionality has received considerable scholarly attention. This book provides the first comprehensive analysis of Avicenna's theory of intentionality.

Demonstrating how Avicenna distinguished theories of meaning (mäna as signification) from intentionality ('the power to represent'), this work presents his theory of intentionality as a form of non-reductive representationalism. It argues that, for Avicenna, cognitive intentionality is explained by the existence of a representational power ultimately rooted in the rational soul as immaterial self-awareness. Furthermore, the book demonstrates that Avicenna's thoughts on intentionality cannot be neatly assimilated into contemporary naturalistic or phenomenal approaches, as his theory strikes a balance between the two. This study offers a novel and systematic perspective on contemporary debates surrounding Avicenna's theory of cognition and intentionality.

Scholars and students of medieval philosophy, Islamic intellectual history, and philosophy of mind will find it essential reading. It is also suitable for academic libraries, philosophy publishers, and those exploring non-Western philosophical traditions.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis eBooks
• Seitenzahl: 172
• Erscheinungstermin: 10. Dezember 2025
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781040652589
• Artikelnr.: 76009325

Autorenporträt

Zhenyu Cai completed his PhD at Cambridge in 2022 and is now the Assistant Professor at Peking University. His research focuses on Arabic philosophy, particularly Avicenna's philosophy of mind and its reception in post-Avicennian and Han kitab traditions.