Thomas Böhm

Comparing the legal mechanisms of redemption of shares, repurchase of shares, and reduction of capital by special resolution, which mechanism is the most effective one in the United Kingdom regime of capital maintenance, and why? (eBook, PDF)

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

Essay from the year 2019 in the subject Law - Civil / Private, Trade, Anti Trust Law, Business Law, grade: A, University of Edinburgh (Edinburgh Law School), course: Company Law, language: English, abstract: In the lifecycle of a company there are situations in which the company may wish to return assets to its members. The most common option is the distribution of capital by way of a dividend. However, the company is not entirely free in this respect as the diminution of the company's assets would undermine creditor protection. Thus, the Companies Act 2006 provides for capital distribution rules which limit the amount a company can distribute to its members. Furthermore, the company may also consider to redeem or repurchase shares. This may be the case, for example, if the company wants to return unneeded equity capital to its members because it can finance its investments out of generated profits, or it wants to replace equity financing with debt financing. In addition, the management may want to buy out a reluctant group of shareholders, or give shareholders the opportunity to exit the company. By contrast, a company may reduce the amounts stated in the capital accounts either to reflect a diminution of the asset value or when the equity capital is over the company's needs. The Companies Act 2006 provides specific procedures for each of these mechanisms to ensure that the interests of creditors and shareholders concerned are adequately protected and that the capital distribution rules cannot simply be circumvented. In this essay, I will compare the legal mechanisms of redemption of shares, repurchase of shares and reduction of capital by special resolution. First of all, I will discuss the general prohibition of acquiring own shares. The following chapters then deal with the individual mechanisms and highlight the extent to which they effectively serve the principle of capital maintenance. When analysing which mechanism is the most effective one, the focus is on creditor protection, since this is ultimately the primary objective of capital maintenance. However, when considering effectiveness, the interests of shareholders as well as the practicability must also be taken into account.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: GRIN Verlag
• Seitenzahl: 18
• Erscheinungstermin: 24. Juni 2019
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9783668964082
• Artikelnr.: 58609106

Autorenporträt

Thomas Böhm ist ein deutscher Jurist und Rechtsanwalt. Nach erfolgreichem Abschluss der juristischen Staatsexamina arbeitete er mehrere Jahre als Rechtsanwalt in internationalen Wirtschaftskanzleien. Dort beriet er schwerpunktmäßig nationale und internationale Investoren, Fonds und Unternehmen im Rahmen von Mergers & Acquisitions sowie im Bereich des Gesellschafts-, Immobilien- und Wirtschaftsrechts. Thomas Böhm absolvierte ein Master of Laws (LL.M.) Studium an der University of Edinburgh im Schwerpunkt Corporate Law. Derzeit arbeitet Thomas Böhm als Syndikusrechtsanwalt in einem international agierenden Unternehmen. Thomas Böhm is a German corporate lawyer. After successfully completing his state law examinations, he worked for several years as a lawyer in international law firms. There he focussed on advising national and international investors, funds and companies in the context of mergers & acquisitions as well as in the area of corporate, commercial and real estate law. Thomas Böhm completed a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree at the University of Edinburgh, specialising in corporate law. Thomas Böhm currently works as an in-house lawyer for an international company.