From the early example of the Adams family to the rise of the Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushes, and Clintons, this book traces how family names became political brands, often bypassing the mechanisms of merit-based governance. With engaging historical narratives, original data analysis, and sharp political commentary, Norcross dismantles the myth of "legacy competence"-the assumption that a familiar last name equals political capability-and shows how dynasties manipulate media, finances, and party systems to maintain their hold on power.
At the heart of the book lies a provocative argument: political dynasties are not just a symptom of inequality, but an active threat to democratic integrity. Through detailed case studies, media critiques, and policy comparisons, Norcross makes the case that dynastic influence erodes institutional accountability, discourages genuine competition, and undermines the Founders' intent.
Whether you are a scholar of governance, a concerned citizen, or simply curious about the deeper forces shaping American leadership, Founders vs. Families offers a compelling and necessary critique of how far we've drifted from a government "by the people." This book is a call to action for a more vigilant, informed, and meritocratic democratic future.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.








