The numerous examples exhibit how one shouldnotreview a medical paper and also illustrate thedon'tsof communication that should be taken care of by reviewers.
Special Features:
- Guidance about what is expected from a reviewer, what should and should not be looked for in the different parts of a manuscript, and how speedy should reviews be
- Detailed explanation of all types of peer review for better understanding of concept
- Tips on communication errors that should be avoided, especially while suggesting revision or rejection of a manuscript
- Lucid language and enjoyable read
This book will be of value to anyone looking for guidance with review of scientific articles, not specifically restricted to medicine. Authors who have been selected to become reviewers for journals, experienced reviewers, and even journal editors will enjoy reading this short and practical manual.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, D ausgeliefert werden.








