Blending philosophy of science/medicine, public health ethics and history, this book offers a framework that explains, analyses and largely endorses the features that de¿ne this relatively new ¿eld. Presenting a philosophical perspective, Valles helps to clarify what these features are and why they matter, including: searching for health's "upstream" causes in social life, embracing a professional commitment to studying and ameliorating the staggering health inequities in and between populations; and reforming scienti¿c practices to foster humility and respect among the many scientists and non- scientists who must work collaboratively to promote health.
Featuring illustrative case studies from around the globe at the end of all main chapters, this radical monograph is written to be accessible to all scholars and advanced students who have an interest in health-from public health students to professional philosophers.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
Ross Upshur (University of Toronto) for the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Valles deftly and compellingly responds to critics who see the turn to upstream determinants as overly broadening the domain of health and the purview of the medical and public health communities. [...] His work will be enormously useful to anyone eager for a thoughtful analysis of population health and it lays down a foundation for continuing conversations about what this exciting new field can and should be.
Christine A. Bachrach (Interdisciplinary Association for Population Health Science) for the American Journal of Preventive Medicine
The book is very accessible; no prior knowledge in philosophy or population health is necessary, although it would be helpful at times. Therefore, I do not hesitate to recommend it to a broad readership. Any population health practitioner or theoretician interested in thinking about meaning, reasoning, and ethics in population health will benefit from reading Valles's arguments, whether she works primarily in health care or comes from a public health perspective. I think the book would be a particularly interesting choice for interdisciplinary courses in public health ethics and medical humanities programs. Graduate students should be aware of the growing literature at the intersection between philosophy and population health. May these ideas catch on and contribute to better health for all.
Olaf Dammann (Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston) for the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH)