Sie sind bereits eingeloggt. Klicken Sie auf 2. tolino select Abo, um fortzufahren.
Bitte loggen Sie sich zunächst in Ihr Kundenkonto ein oder registrieren Sie sich bei bücher.de, um das eBook-Abo tolino select nutzen zu können.
The First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution begins: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . ." The Supreme Court has consistently held that these words, usually called the "religion clauses," were meant to prohibit laws that violate religious freedom or equality. In recent years, however, a growing number of constitutional law and history scholars have contended that the religion clauses were not intended to protect religious freedom, but to reserve the states' rights to legislate on. If the states' rights…mehr
The First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution begins: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . ." The Supreme Court has consistently held that these words, usually called the "religion clauses," were meant to prohibit laws that violate religious freedom or equality. In recent years, however, a growing number of constitutional law and history scholars have contended that the religion clauses were not intended to protect religious freedom, but to reserve the states' rights to legislate on. If the states' rights interpretation of the religion clauses were correct and came to be accepted by the Supreme Court, it could profoundly affect the way the Court decides church-state cases involving state laws. It would allow the states to legislate on religion-even to violate religious freedom, discriminate on the basis of religion, or to establish a particular religion. This book carefully, thoroughly, and critically examines all the arguments for such an interpretation and, more importantly, all the available historical evidence. It concludes that the clauses were meant to protect religious freedom and equality of the individuals not the states' rights
Die Herstellerinformationen sind derzeit nicht verfügbar.
Autorenporträt
By Ellis M. West
Inhaltsangabe
Preface Introduction Clarification of the Issue The Origin of the "Substantive" Versus "Jurisdictional" Terminology The Problem with the Word "Substantive" The Problem with the Word "Jurisdictional" Must the Religion Clauses Be Either Normative or Federalist? The Different Federalist Interpretations of the Clauses A Critical Analysis of the Federalist Interpretation An Overview of the Arguments An Assessment of the Arguments' Logic The Ratification Debate and Proposed Religion Clauses The Significance of the Debate Issues: What Kind of Laws Pertaining to Religion Did Both Federalists and Anti-federalists Want to Prohibit, and Why? The Views of the Federalists The Views of the Anti-federalists The Drafting of the Religion Clauses The Role and Views of James Madison A Summary of What Happened in the First Congress The Meaning of the Debate in the House on August 15 Changes in the Wording of the Clauses The Final Wording of the Establishment Clause The Relevance of Madison's Amendment to Protect Religious Liberty in the States Summary Were the Framers Hopelessly Divided over Government and Religion? The Case for Lack of Consensus An Assessment of the Case for Lack of Consensus The Case for the Existence of Consensus Conclusion The Early American Understanding of the Religion Clauses Comments on the Clauses during Their Ratification Interpretations of the Clauses by the Clergy Interpretations of the Clauses by Other Public Figures Commentaries on the Constitution The Widespread Belief that the Bill of Rights Applied to the States Jefferson and Madison's Interpretation of the Clauses Conclusion The Federalist Interpretation of the Religion Clauses: A Concluding Assessment
Preface Introduction Clarification of the Issue The Origin of the "Substantive" Versus "Jurisdictional" Terminology The Problem with the Word "Substantive" The Problem with the Word "Jurisdictional" Must the Religion Clauses Be Either Normative or Federalist? The Different Federalist Interpretations of the Clauses A Critical Analysis of the Federalist Interpretation An Overview of the Arguments An Assessment of the Arguments' Logic The Ratification Debate and Proposed Religion Clauses The Significance of the Debate Issues: What Kind of Laws Pertaining to Religion Did Both Federalists and Anti-federalists Want to Prohibit, and Why? The Views of the Federalists The Views of the Anti-federalists The Drafting of the Religion Clauses The Role and Views of James Madison A Summary of What Happened in the First Congress The Meaning of the Debate in the House on August 15 Changes in the Wording of the Clauses The Final Wording of the Establishment Clause The Relevance of Madison's Amendment to Protect Religious Liberty in the States Summary Were the Framers Hopelessly Divided over Government and Religion? The Case for Lack of Consensus An Assessment of the Case for Lack of Consensus The Case for the Existence of Consensus Conclusion The Early American Understanding of the Religion Clauses Comments on the Clauses during Their Ratification Interpretations of the Clauses by the Clergy Interpretations of the Clauses by Other Public Figures Commentaries on the Constitution The Widespread Belief that the Bill of Rights Applied to the States Jefferson and Madison's Interpretation of the Clauses Conclusion The Federalist Interpretation of the Religion Clauses: A Concluding Assessment
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826